 | | How I've been procrastinating...
|
|
I know, I know--I should be building a robot for rtl11... Instead I made this: (URL) threw the RC unit from 8475 RC vehicle into the 8466 4x4. It's alotta fun to drive around, though the big tires and the weight of the vehicle slow it down a bit, as (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Train width clearance for wide turns, etc.
|
|
(...) I just measured the new caboose, and I think we'd need 13.1 for it. It's the tallest car I have; other folks will have to weigh in with their models. Hey! - that's right, I've got a virtual Club Car - and it looks like it needs 11.2. I agree (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Train width clearance for wide turns, etc.
|
|
(...) Sorry I didn't get a chance to dig my cars out last night. I'll do it tonight and post bogie locations and lenghts for tomorrow. The good thing with the sweeping turns is the cars won't stick out as much. Derek (23 years ago, 30-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Train width clearance for wide turns, etc.
|
|
(...) My trains do pretty much make use of the full 15 brick clearence. But I really only request that there be one line that I can run on. I think the outside loop makes the most sense. If people want to deside to make the inner loops 6 wide only (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Train width clearance for wide turns, etc.
|
|
(...) If the top town is called Altenburg, what is the bottom villages called? (...) Speaking of that, I'm having a lot of trouble with making things 14-15 brick tall compliant. This requirement really stretches the vertical axis of buildings far (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
