|
 | | Re: We're going to lose our position...
|
| (...) So last night, I sat down in front of the mountain of lego... that will take me a good week to resort... I looked at my tri-griper EOAT that I got to grip and run up a 1 x 16 rack... not in the right order of course.... and I decided to start (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |  | | Re: Robot Accuracy
|
| (...) this is my plan. I want to SLOW the entire thing down, and start to display data on the LCD. Bruce suggested to me that maybe some "stack" is not mis behaving. So a question to the Group. if a v 1.0 RCX that is always powered by an official (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |  | | Re: 2002 FBTB comments
|
| Hey Calum, 2002 and we've cut our expectations back to basic tubs. Hmm, not much of a stretch from here to the belching smokestacks and mega-urban wasteland of Bladerunner. :P I know what you mean about the sets, but I'm finding that I'm getting (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |  | | Re: Robot Accuracy
|
| (...) To (mis)quote the IBM commercial: "That's when it hits you: You are so beat by Bruce." :) If it makes you feel better, I have disassembled pretty well all of the xEmployees entry to increase sensor resolution, gearing ratios, EOAT speeds and a (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |  | | Re: Robot Accuracy
|
| (...) WELL, truth be told, what Derek told us really scared me. from my current speed of (bleep) the thought of having to shave off 4 more seconds.... I just knew I could NOT do it in software. i took a look at my code and i can safely say that ALL (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |