 | | Re: NXT software -- my view
|
|
(...) the last software for the RCX was the LEGO SDK 2.5. it had a nice MINDSCRIPT software that was neiter BASIC, not C. SOMEONE at lego seemed to thing there was a need for it. so why not for the NXT? Chris basic? basic? buller? (19 years ago, 20-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT software -- my view
|
|
(...) DAVE!! save your $$ the NXT just aint all its cracked up to be. $0.02 and a PERSOANL opinion. I mean its ok. im not tossing mine in the garbage. but... well, I've yet to make a WORKING robot. YES, there are a LOT of GOD builders with NICE (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Assembly Line Project
|
|
Iain Hendry wrote: We can each make up little fake (...) Riiigggghhhhhttttt and then after snack we can all come to my house and watch wresteling! :) Chris (19 years ago, 20-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Assembly Line Project
|
|
(...) YA!! whats up with that!!!?? (...) wow, you guys seem to think these diners are structured or something. How are you proposing (...) I want to fool around with 2 touch sensors face to face. but I dont see why a light beam wouldnt work? Chris (19 years ago, 20-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: We may have to come up with somethign bigger...
|
|
(...) That was pretty much the exact idea that I presented to Kjeld when I went on the Inside Tour. As Calum said though, reliability would be the downfall-as well as speed. Its too bad bricks are not magnetic, then could use a magnetic crane. I was (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: We may have to come up with somethign bigger...
|
|
(...) While I'm not part of the rtltoronto clan, from the things I've seen you guys do, there is a lot of talent up there. If you want a suggestion for a 'project', how about the following: A pick and place system that can pull any variety of bricks (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: We may have to come up with somethign bigger...
|
|
(...) Yes, this is correct. The slowest station on the line will be the limiting factor in the production rate. That said, I don't think we need to "one up" anything, this is purely for fun. We've never done a large group collaborative project other (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Assembly Line Project
|
|
(...) That's what I figured. Not having any of these motors, I cobbled it in LDRAW, and the clips in the model are too low. I figure I'll just make a dolly the same size from bricks and the old train wheels (with the metal axle from the 4.5V days) (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: We may have to come up with somethign bigger...
|
|
(...) That's right! We have to agree that everyone will try and meet some maximum time. No worm gears allowed! :) (...) Well, we could, but that would get pretty complicated in a hurry, I think. But it's not unlike the Montrac system - there are (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We may have to come up with somethign bigger...
|
|
(...) Correct me if I'm wrong, but the cadence will be set by the slowest assembly cell, correct? So if your goal is a a fast cadence, you need *every* cell to meet at least that minimum requirement. Or, since you are using train track, with (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
