Subject:
|
Re: We may have to come up with somethign bigger...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:01:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1757 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Iain Hendry wrote:
|
Theyre slow. Im expecting if we pull this
off, well have a cadence of a few seconds per
car; maybe 10 or so, tops.
|
Correct me if Im wrong, but the cadence will be set by the slowest assembly
cell, correct? So if your goal is a a fast cadence, you need *every* cell to
meet at least that minimum requirement.
Or, since you are using train track, with switching points that can be controled
by an RCX as well, is there is one slow step in the process it can be
duplicated, with the transport vehicles alternating between the left and right
brance, effectively halving the time for that step by doubling the assembly
cells.
That train track could really be handy. In an extreme example, you could switch
out portions of the line that have faulted out for some reason, or need to be
restocked.
--
Brian Davis
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|