Subject:
|
Re: We may have to come up with somethign bigger...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:56:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1649 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
| |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5f6zV7UFEH4
Been done. Twice now.
Though to be said, not nearly as great as the plan we have, but if this guy
can assemble 5 ‘pieces’, then we have got to come up with somethign bigger...
|
I’m going to go cry. :(
Seriously though, these other assembly projects are incredible, but all have one
major flaw (in my eyes): They’re slow. I’m expecting if we pull this off,
we’ll have a cadence of a few seconds per car; maybe 10 or so, tops. By
decentralizing everything into individual processes, the overall cycle time
drops substantially. It’s not like having one robot that does every function;
it’s delegated into smaller functions (stations/cells) that all happen in
parallel.
While each individual car might take a minute or two to make a full circuit of
the assembly line, we can have a car coming off like every 5 seconds.
-Iain
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
