Subject:
|
Re: We may have to come up with somethign bigger...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:42:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1735 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Brian Davis wrote:
| |
| |
They’re slow. I’m expecting if we pull this
off, we’ll have a cadence of a few seconds per
car; maybe 10 or so, tops.
|
Correct me if I’m wrong, but the cadence will be set by the slowest assembly
cell, correct? So if your goal is a a fast cadence, you need *every* cell to
meet at least that minimum requirement.
|
Yes, this is correct. The slowest station on the line will be the limiting
factor in the production rate.
That said, I don’t think we need to “one up” anything, this is purely for fun.
We’ve never done a large group collaborative project other than train layouts so
it’s not a bad idea to try something like this to begin with and graduate to
something more advanced once we’re satisfied with the first one.
Calum
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
