 | | Re: rtl22 working concept
|
|
(...) OK, thats the NEW criteria. "we need to use a marker SO LARGE, iain feels uncomfortable." NOW, can we talk about steve's balls? Chris (19 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
 | | Re: rtl22 working concept
|
|
(...) I think you just want to use a marker that says "edding BOO" on it. :) Calum, post that photo of the World's Largest Marker (TM) at Spatles. That marker was so large it made me feel insecure about myself. Iain (19 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
 | | Re: rtl22 working concept
|
|
(...) If only one game is played, the bot that plays first will be at a big disadvantage... (19 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
 | | Re: rtl22 working concept
|
|
(...) Calum, I think you missed my point. When I said "easier" to draw. I meant to imply, that the robot who plays O would be at a SLIGHT timed disadvantage, vs. the X playing bot. We need to finalize a "timed" game and or would each "round" (...) (19 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
 | | Re: rtl22 working concept
|
|
(...) I'd suggest a template that has a very light X and O marked in tiny dots. This would be the "ideal" mark location, and robots (and humans) should try to make them as close as possible top these. -Rob A> (19 years ago, 13-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|