 | | Queens University (Kingston) to try breaking bridge record
|
|
I found this (FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2005) and haven't seen it posted. (URL) "The team is working to accumulate enough Lego blocks to build a bridge spanning up to six metres—surpassing efforts of a previous team who built a three-metre bridge." (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.loc.ca.on, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think we shoudl try this sometime...
|
|
(...) I don't get why you wouldn't know it perfectly the second time through? Derek (21 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: to recap-- was Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
(...) I don't really like this. I think the opening should be much more constrained, like Chris was talking about. X blocks high Y studs wide. No variation allowed. It's going to be hard to tell if you found a hole, or are stuck between two other (...) (21 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I think we shoudl try this sometime...
|
|
(...) I have that maze that I made for BF a couple of years ago. It has adjustable walls. This allows for a practice period followed by a change in maze geometry for the actual competition. Thus people cannot "preprogram" the winning route. I am not (...) (21 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments from a laundromat ...
|
|
Rob Antonishen wrote: > On 9/27/05, Chris Magno wrote: > snipping rob being patronizing. Maybe adding a standing rule that all entries > have to run once on their own in a "qualifying" round to compete. > now this idea has some merit !!!! THIS rule (...) (21 years ago, 27-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
