|
|
 | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) Chris wants to score... ;) Well, if we go in the direction of an orifice--therefore your 'bot can only mate with another 'bot from one direction (I can't see how else it cam be done), then (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) I was swayed by Calums arguement at dinner-- if the rules for BoP were changed to-- your 'bot must fit within the end of the beam and the 1 foot mark, as well as be under 2 feet 'tall' at hte start of the match. This would not preclude the (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) no, thats different. a size rule, still allows you to EXPAND a tower, if you were that clever. a no touch the ground rule, would disqualify any bot that broke, or had parts brake off. but this game is the past. lets move forward to scoring. (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) SO just say "at no time must an entry intentionally contact the ground." -Rob A> (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) i dont read this enuff. it makes this more challenging, and I think opens it (...) actually, you can still enter a "box" with a distribution EOAT. someone suggested a 4 sided box with 4 bumpers. and a EOAT that turns to the pumper hit. i like (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
