To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / *13154 (-20)
  Re: Star Chamber?
 
MWAHAHAHA!!! That's awesome. -Stefan- (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
 
  Ignore this post (Re: Open letter ...)
 
(...) I think the thing that bothers a large number of people is that it's impossible to ignore. There was a group created for discussions on this subject. If someone has an interest in reading and posting on this, they should read lugnet.color. (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
Hello! (...) end. Hm, browsing through this Letter-to-CEO-thread I see those who agree to the letter and disagree to the colour change just saying "I agree to the letter", name, age. Those who do not agree to the letter (and possibly agree to the (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Star Chamber?
 
(...) It wouldn't fit, vignettes are only supposed to be 8x8! (Eh, what? You meant the CHAIR, not my head? Oh! never mind... good suggestion.) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
 
  Re: Boat Motor
 
(...) I don't know if that will work. I'm not sure if a single 2x2 set of dots will stick to the hull given than the motor is pushing an inch down from where that piece is. Of course, the motor doesn't put out a lot of force, but it might not stick (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.boats, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Re: Star Chamber?
 
(...) Nice work Bruce, but you forgot ++Lar's throne/old Star Trek style captain's chair. -Keith (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
 
  Boat Motor
 
Anyone know if the New boat motor in [LEGOSet 4669] or [LEGOSet 7244] can be attached to the botton of, and provide enough ballast to, the old boats like [LEGOSet 3111] that use the ballast weight to replace the ballast weight? I was thinking it (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.boats, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
 
  Re: Star Chamber?
 
(...) LOL!! What I want to know is, when they head for lunch, do they march along singing "Dink-dink, dink-dink-dink-DINK DINK dink..." a la "Spaceballs"? ;) KDJ LUGNETer #203 (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
 
  Star Chamber?
 
(...) Hmm, would that look something like (URL) this>? (URL) Bruce (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX) ! 
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) It was funny though. And made the point. (...) Apology accepted on behalf of just me. But we're still not mailing you the instruction manual. (because there isn't one!) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Steve's Ball hanging out at Wendy's
 
(...) Here's a moronic ditty I remember from a few decades back... Ronald McDonald stuck his Big Mac into Wendy's Hot-'N-Juicy, shortly after Burger King was born - he was a Whopper! -Patrick (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) K, that was a little too snarky, even for me. I apologize. Dave K -note: no admin or anyone else e-mailed me to tell me to rethink my post. I just read it again and realized that it really was too snarky. (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) We in rtlT have control over what is spotlighted? Wow! We in rtlT have control over who bringswhat thread into our NG? That's great! We in rtlT have control over who can post in this NG? Perfect! That'll make things much better for us--nowif (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) I did say we were bothguilty of it. So there you are. (...) And you weren't interested in any of my posts that were not 'kissups to TLC' or me stating that I wasn't in the 'anti-colourchange' camp. So we're both doing it--where, in the end, (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
Thank you, Calum, for putting so eloqently how mony of us feel about this ridiculous letter. Last time I checked, Lego is still a toy, not a commodity to be traded on the stock market. It's a toy, either build with it or don't, but quit whining (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) =) Dude, you've got a lot of pent-up emotion towards me.... Lets go over to lugnet.people.lgbt and get it on!!! Have your way with me, but just get it outta your system. ;) No, but seriously... You're creeping me out. It's kewl though. Peace, (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) Unfortunately it is not possible to stop anyone from spotlighting any post they want to, so that request is pointless. ROSCO (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) Ouch. (...) It wasn't "just" posted on your forum. It was highlighted as "top story" on the homepage of this website. I am not a member of your forum, but I am a member of lugnet, and replied as such. If you don't want outsiders invading your (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) It's true, I don't know Derek. I'm sure he's a nice guy. For all you know, I might be too. But Derek's last post wasn't "nice." My response was commesurate. (...) You criticize me, and yet you call me "obsessed", and lump me with quite a few (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR