 | | Re: <<expletive indicating frustration deleted>> language —Paul Baulch
|
| | | Richard Parsons wrote in message ... (...) Unfortunately I don't receive legible television broadcasts[1] (and certainly nothing that screens prior to 8:30pm), and I don't fraternize to a significant extent with my fellow poor unfortunate colonials, (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: <<expletive indicating frustration deleted>> language —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | "Paul Baulch" <paul@vic.bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:FwrLIM.253@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) No, see, that's the problem. If I explain exactly what I mean, I'll be falling foul of the, how do you call them, sepos, and get my miserable (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: <<expletive indicating frustration deleted>> language —Benjamin Whytcross
|
| | | | | (...) I'd have to say that that would suit me fine. It does get a bit annoying when you hear from one side that this isn't an american-centric site, while on the other we're being forced to use language that the americans approve of, or risk as you (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | (canceled) —Jamie Obrien
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: <<expletive indicating frustration deleted>> language —Braith Garden
|
| | | | | | (...) used (...) There are probably a few juniors reading our posts too. Keep that in mind when you feel the need to make things more 'colourful'. Lego *is* made for kids afterall! Braith. (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: <<expletive indicating frustration deleted>> language —Paul Baulch
|
| | | | Richard Parsons wrote in message ... (...) and (...) a (...) Ah. Yes, please. Cheers, Paul LUGNET member 164 (URL) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
| | | | |
