Subject:
|
Re: <<expletive indicating frustration deleted>> language
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.au
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Jun 2000 01:55:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
621 times
|
| |
|
|
Richard Parsons wrote in message ...
>
> This being an org and an au etc, and open to the possibility that there are
> behaviours considered appropriate here that might fall foul of the
> aesthetics of other more advanced beings in other more advanced places, is
> there any chance that we could govern the language considered acceptable
> here based on something slightly more in keeping with the poor unfortunate
> colonials hereabouts, like say the language allowed on commercial free to
> air television in Australia before say, 8.30pm?
Unfortunately I don't receive legible television broadcasts[1] (and
certainly nothing that screens prior to 8:30pm), and I don't fraternize to a
significant extent with my fellow poor unfortunate colonials, so I was
wondering whether you could divulge a more straightforward clarification
using less bewilderingly obfuscated referential terminology.
No worries with the big words though, they're beaut.
Cheers,
Paul
LUGNET member 164
http://www.geocities.com/doctorshnub/
[1] Bloody antenna's gone bung. She'll be right, though, me mate brings over
Buffy and Fartscrape^H^H^H^H^H^H Farscape on tape.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | <<expletive indicating frustration deleted>> language
|
| Evening gang, This being an org and an au etc, and open to the possibility that there are behaviours considered appropriate here that might fall foul of the aesthetics of other more advanced beings in other more advanced places, is there any chance (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.au)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
