 | | Brisbanites...have a LegOz !
|
|
With all the Brisbanites/Bundaburgers posting, maybe you should think about holding a LegOz ? Someone should take the initiative. If you build it...they will come. pete.w <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au> (26 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) I knew that link was around somewhere, but had lost site -- errr, sight -- of it. Steve (26 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) The /news/traffic/ page will also send you that way yonder. --Todd (26 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) Aha!! I often saw some groups in "plain" view but never realized what instigated that... thanks! -Shiri (26 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) Frank, Steve: Have you tried the link in the yellow box that says View plain (without subgroups) ? --Todd (26 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations - re liability
|
|
(...) They're a big organization with offices, membership dues, a board of directors, etc -- and as you say, they carry insurance. There's no comparision. (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations - re liability
|
|
(...) Some thoughts... At least in the US, waivers actually are worth very little. Probably the only place they really do any good is permission slips for public school activities. Of course here, the government is already relatively immune to (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations - meetings in bars
|
|
I guess this is somewhat at a tangent from teh rest of the thread, but I am very glad personally that the VLC doesn't meet in a bar, or even adjourn to a bar after meetings. As a non-drinker and non-smoker, I hate having to be in bars. Besides, the (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations - re liability
|
|
I am puzzled by the liability problems referenced in this thread. Someone mentioned, as a comparison, the SCA (Society for Creative Anachronism), and I'd just like to draw that parallel in a little more detail: The SCA holds large events for in (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
I had an idea which might work for some groups (perhaps not NELUG) which would allow a group to have an age limitation in the 18-21 range but still allow younger AFOLs to attend meetings. That is, to set the age limit for *membership*, but to allow (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) Which could be viewed as a weakness of the web interface - the generalized, higher-level groups get blasted with *all* the messages, not just the generalized, higher-level messages. Steve (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) I perhaps should have gone into more depth on my thoughts. My thinking is that with trains as a catalyst for forming the group, the demographics may have been different. I can't enumerate the factors that lead me to this thought because it is (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
FUT lugnet.org (...) Well I don't know about the other "True" LUGs but I don't think being a LUG as opposed to an LTC had anything to do with it. I think it mostly came down to the demographics of our group at the begining. Like Todd pointed out I (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nclug, lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) Thanks Bram, Obviously this should have read "I have heard some good arguments for changing the rule and some good arguments for NOT changing the rule". (...) Well no problem, I just wish the discussion had remained civil so my "Devil inside" (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) ^^^^^^^^ (...) ^^^^^^^^ Well, that doesn't leave you much choice, does it? :) j/k Thanks for being civil, --Bram Bram Lambrecht.........Br...L@JUNO.com (URL) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
Now that I have had time to read and reread all of the posts in this thread and I have calmed to below boiling point I thought I would try and make a constructive post about some of my feelings about this issue. (Please note that I said "some of my (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug) !
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations - my two cents
|
|
(...) take (...) the (...) case (...) groups (...) logical (...) Jumping in from outside again (please note - follow-ups to lugnet.org), please take the following as a suggestion (and other LUGs who are grappling with membership policies should also (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) I had been containing the discussion primarily to lugnet.org.us because it seemed like one of the major concerns was liability (and as a person involved in organizing a LUG, that is really my only concern), but I did entertain the thought that (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) You know what? You're right. I hate that! FUT lugnet.org, who so far have missed out on the blast. Take your general questions there. (or maybe to lugnet.loc.it, I hear they're itching for some long post chains so they can pass lugnet.loc.uk (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org)
|
