To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.test.fooOpen lugnet.off-topic.test.foo in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Testing / Foo / *347 (-20)
  Re: civilized people
 
(...) I thank you for admitting that this got way out of proportion. I acknowledge that (as is always the danger with jokes) that while not overstepping my authority at the time, as it was defined, my test/joke (of temporarily revoking your posting (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: civilized people
 
(...) I want my King back!!! Dave K (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  civilized people
 
I'm done with this. This horse is dead. I would like to end this in a civilized manner. If Larry is willing to acknowledge that at the time of the .foo silliness, he used action where words, in my view, would have been more appropriate, then I will (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Re: My inner child is dead.
 
In lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) I actually rather enjoyed it. Someone has to keep the king in check or we'll get to hte point where the 'emporer has no clothes'. ;p Dave K (20 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  My inner child is dead.
 
OK, a bit harsh for some silly .foo forum, but i need to let it be known that a line was crossed. Sorry lar, but it was. People can say they "dared you" to ban me, but the ultimate decision lay in yor hands. in my little mind, you abused your power. (...) (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: There will be no grovelling except my own
 
(...) If Chris can't handle a little smack, he don't deserve king and if larry is having fun doing what he's doing, then let the good times roll, i say. so there you are--the jester has spoken--all is well in the world of .foo Dave K (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  There will be no grovelling except my own
 
Last night, while playing here "in .foo" as a total newbie and totally unaware of the history of such things... I made a huge mistake, for which I am totally prepared to grovel for forgiveness (take note, this is a rare thing for me to do). After (...) (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: I cannot post here
 
(...) they didn't update the page for the hottie on the front page, but the daily hottie forum has had new hotties for at least 2 weeks, though some weren't that good... in my opinion, of course. some were reallly nice Dave K (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: I cannot post here
 
(...) Buncha heathens and/or script kiddies (...) Dude, when I stopped checking, there hadn't been a new hottie there for weeks and weeks. Did it start back up again? (now you know where all those Elin hits were coming from... frustrated LICDers) (...) (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: I cannot post here
 
(...) Everyone seemed to get hacked or having issues with DoS attacks One of my favourite sites was taken down--Least I could Do! No Hottie today!!! Grr!!! Dave K (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: I cannot post here
 
(...) And I shall endeavour to collect. Wish me luck! (the two bots that were hammering LUGNET earlier today have been stopped by Todd, I should be able to post on the first try now) (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: I cannot post here
 
(...) LOL, thanks Lar! I owe you one! Janey "Laughing my butt off Red Brick" (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: I cannot post here
 
(...) You question the royal logic??????? (...) I think good king wenceslas makes more sense at this time of the year. ROSCO (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: I cannot post here
 
(...) er, who silenced whom? (you can answer in the .bar) (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: I cannot post here
 
(...) I wouldn't be so sure! (...) I don't think that's legal here. (...) Yeah I will get right on that, delusional boy. (...) King? King? King of what???? Janey "Pass me the Red Brick" (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: I cannot post here
 
(...) you ~might~ be royalty, but KING...... you ain't (...) HA! as KING i can make up words and have them added to the lexicon. (is that a good king word?) Chris King (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: I cannot post here
 
(...) Yes, Lar+= has that ability. notice how even though he "claims" to have special powers, i (as king) can silence him, you have a cold? look, take this corporate .foo pharmaceutical credit card, head down to yee-get-well shoppe, and get (...) (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: I cannot post here
 
(...) HEY!! What makes you think I'm NOT a king type???? I mean I know the thing about work being for the common folk, so I MUST be a king. QED. (...) That doesn't sound very kingly to me. ROSCO (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR