|
|
 | | Re: Silly Town Names
|
| (...) I don't know for sure if this exists, but I believe there is a small town in Michigan called Hell. -dead (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | |  | | Re: Silly Town Names
|
| (...) Toadsuck, Arkansas Steve (25 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | |  | | Re: Silly Town Names
|
| (...) Intercourse Pennsylvania is one of my favorites. Eric Kingsley (25 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | |  | | Re: Silly Town Names
|
| You Australians have some of the silliest town names I've ever heard. Wagga- wagga is my favorite. I like Happy, Texas. (25 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | |  | | Re: Silly Town Names
|
| (...) How about Monkey's Eyebrow, Kentucky... -Jeremiah- (25 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | |  | | (canceled)
|
| | | |  | | Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
|
| (...) I second Tom Stangl who said: (...) For me too, that worked very well. It enabled me to brouwse through several part categories very quickly after one another. I had some trouble to find certain part categories, but that was because I was used (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | |  | | Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
|
| (...) KEYWORDS is an option that authors can include in their LDraw parts. So far, not many parts include KEYWORDS. For the /partsref/keyword/ page, I also compiled most of the words from the part names. The intent of the page is to let people look (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | |  | | Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
|
| (...) Good to see Larry got the cross-posting right... (...) Umm, I'm confused -- the detail pages are essentially the same. Sure, they've got the new LUGNET-ish headers and footers, and now the 73 LDraw categories are arranged into a 2-level (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | |  | | Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
|
| (...) One BIG improvement would be to crossref parts with the sets they come in. I know getting the data is a huge undertaking, as it amounts to doing inventories of all the sets. But if inventories were actually used in this way I guess this would (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| |