 | | Re: Uber-Galic question
|
| (...) We could all use some Mazel... (1) Cheers, - jsproat 1. Name that play -- my #1 fave. (27 years ago, 13-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Uber-Galic question
|
| Sproat, you mean "craving in"? I hope it's you and not Bam-Bam, unless you were planning on expecting, in which case, Matzeltov;-) [1] -John [1] spell-checker has no idea how to spell it, either:-p (...) (27 years ago, 13-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Perl rules!
|
| (...) Yeah, I had a nice discussion on this exact subject a while ago elsewhere. Maintainability is usually more important than efficiency or looking pretty. However, to be maintainable, code has to be written in ways that can be understood easily. (...) (27 years ago, 12-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) Alors, switch to eine karakter-tabell die sie wohl hat. Jasper (27 years ago, 12-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Finally happy with my site. Plus some additions.
|
| (...) lungs, (...) seasonings, (...) Actually I think we agree. The descriptor I was slightly disagreeing with was "experience": you might change it to "mistake" or "regret" :) It's amazing the food that's been invented by folks in tough times. Who (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Finally happy with my site. Plus some additions.
|
| (...) Well, ya. Which descriptor were you struggling with? Tough to chew? That's the stomach part. Now, granted, the person preparing it may not have known all there is to know about the fine art(1) of haggis preparation, but all those descriptors (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Finally happy with my site. Plus some additions.
|
| (...) Egads, (...) Actually I meant that you shouldn't miss it like the flu once it's over. (...) From some dictionary, used without permission, but I figured if they really wanted me to know things they wouldn't copyright them ;-) : hag'is n. A (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) BTW, Lar, please note that this entire thread was compleately devoid of my addresses....just some food for thought. But look out, cuz I'M BAACK!!;-) -John (27 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) Only about Rapunzel. (...) Hehe "The circle is now complete..." (...) You're invited over for cigars, BTW. (...) And times were lean after that. -Tom McD. when replying, never go rafting down the Colorado river on a spamcake. (27 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) It would seam sew. (...) Calling them VERY BAD is just repundant. Besides, no one calls them good. (...) Hola, estoy muy bien, gracias. Los symbolicos de las accentas no son presentan en este contrapcion. -Tom McD. when replying, note that (...) (27 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
|
