 | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | (...) Groupware is a nice idea. (...) It's just that I've never seen or heard of any implementation yet which, _especially_ in the area of email delivery (which is ridiuclously high-volume compared to almost all other groupware traffic), doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) OK, whew. Got enough to debate you as it is... (...) Or just use news. Really! I've seen it done. (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) By the way.. in one or two of your posts lately I thought I detected a certain.. how shall I put that.. annoyance at me personally as opposed with my arguments. Any comments? (...) For brainstorming sessions of more than, say, 3-4 people, it's (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Annoyance? naaa.... <ponder> Urp, no more than usual/no more than I am at anyone else? You're misguided, confused, idealistic and generally wrong when it comes to freedom, economics and markets, but I like you anyway in spite of all that. I (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) Ah, that's OK then. (...) Awwwww... shucks. (...) I think it would probably be more suited in off-topic.people. But then, we can't really put it there. (...) You could call me ... "democrat" (Or, for that matter, "republican" or (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Wouldn't surprise me. (...) Would surprise me. Samba blows. Sorry, but it does. Touching it with 95/98, which, unfortunately, is what a ton of places use, is a slow painful joke. Touching it with NT is slightly better, but still slow and (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | (...) The question is, how does it's blowiness relate to the negative-mass white hole that is NT SMB serving? Jasper (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Well, not sure. But in *my* admittedly limited Linux/Samba experience trying to introduce Samba as an alternative to NT for file serving is a joke. File copies went from seconds to minutes on 95/98, and at increased dramatically even when (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
