 | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Let's be sure we're on the same page. If you're saying groupware itself is not a good thing, vehemently disagree. I'll be happy to briefly explain how indispensable it is if that is what you were saying. However, if you're saying that Exchange (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | (...) Groupware is a nice idea. (...) It's just that I've never seen or heard of any implementation yet which, _especially_ in the area of email delivery (which is ridiuclously high-volume compared to almost all other groupware traffic), doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) OK, whew. Got enough to debate you as it is... (...) Or just use news. Really! I've seen it done. (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) By the way.. in one or two of your posts lately I thought I detected a certain.. how shall I put that.. annoyance at me personally as opposed with my arguments. Any comments? (...) For brainstorming sessions of more than, say, 3-4 people, it's (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Annoyance? naaa.... <ponder> Urp, no more than usual/no more than I am at anyone else? You're misguided, confused, idealistic and generally wrong when it comes to freedom, economics and markets, but I like you anyway in spite of all that. I (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) Ah, that's OK then. (...) Awwwww... shucks. (...) I think it would probably be more suited in off-topic.people. But then, we can't really put it there. (...) You could call me ... "democrat" (Or, for that matter, "republican" or (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Wouldn't surprise me. (...) Would surprise me. Samba blows. Sorry, but it does. Touching it with 95/98, which, unfortunately, is what a ton of places use, is a slow painful joke. Touching it with NT is slightly better, but still slow and (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | (...) The question is, how does it's blowiness relate to the negative-mass white hole that is NT SMB serving? Jasper (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: KDE/new Redhat install (was Re: Has anyone ever been) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Well, not sure. But in *my* admittedly limited Linux/Samba experience trying to introduce Samba as an alternative to NT for file serving is a joke. File copies went from seconds to minutes on 95/98, and at increased dramatically even when (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
