To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 5168
5167  |  5169
Subject: 
Re: Smallest cube ever!?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:58:39 GMT
Viewed: 
4359 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Timothy Gould wrote:

(snip)

   Of course this should be all non-integer cubes are impossible...

Tim

I’m not so sure about that... If I understand correctly, the main issue here is to produce a flat square surface with a non-integer number of studs as side, right?

Because that is certainly possible, taking inspiration of Jason Alleman (http://news.lugnet.com/announce/moc/?n=3255) and using panel pieces:



Which is half a plate smaller than a 5-stud square. Of course to make a full flat cube out of that, you’d need to built 6 of these, some kind of cubic frame around it, and make sure everything is properly held in place together...

Let’s say that part is left as exercise for the reader (that’s a fancy way to say I’m too lazy to do it myself, plus there’s a chance I’m horribly wrong)

Jean-Marc



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Smallest cube ever!?
 
(...) It's still an integer number of plates (which was my condition). Tim (18 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Smallest cube ever!?
 
(...) Of course this should be all non-integer cubes are impossible... Tim (18 years ago, 22-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)

13 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR