 | | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :)
|
|
Subject: Re: Rechargeable Batteries From: "Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen" <lgjPURGE@jyde.dk> Newsgroups: lugnet.off-topic.geek TJ Avery's utterance expressed in news:HGFAzq.1xBp@lugnet.com: (...) What project? (...) They are available in 2000 mAh too. (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :)
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lars Gjerløw Jørgensen" <lgjPURGE@jyde.dk> To: <lugnet.off-topic.ge...ugnet.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:47 AM Subject: Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :) <snip> </snip> (...) drops (...) (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :)
|
|
Peter Newman's utterance expressed in news:Law11-OE61ygIDd...tmail.com: (...) Yep - that is what I mean too - sorry if I wasn't clear about it :) In Denmark the old type of non-rechargeable batteries are called "brunsten" which translated gives (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :)
|
|
(...) Those would be known as "carbon-zinc" batteries. We tend to name our battery types based on what chemicals are used to store/provide power. I'm not sure you can even buy them in the standard letter-graded battery types anymore. Certainly not (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Rechargeable Batteries - with correct link :)
|
|
(...) My primary reason for using them is that they're less expensive than non-rechargables in the long run, and my secondary reason is that I never have to walk out the door with half-depleted batteries. My reason for using them over Ni-Cads is the (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
