Subject:
|
Re: awk vs. perl for simple tasks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 May 1999 19:54:03 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@geocities[spamless].com
|
Viewed:
|
437 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> That's good if you're snarfing up relatively small files, but what if you're
> processing 100 megabytes of STDIN -- say, looking through an httpd log? And
> live tail -f even? :)
It just occurred to me how useful a live tail util would be. How would you
implement one in Perl? Would the one at PPT (1) be the one to check out?
Cheers,
- jsproat
1. http://language.perl.com/ppt/index.html
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
May the Force be with y'all.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: awk vs. perl for simple tasks
|
| (...) check whether the file size has changed, which, although gross in theory, is perfectly fine in practice if there aren't a zillion copies of it running. Dunno how many Unix implementations have file-change events/signals like NT does, but I'd (...) (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: awk vs. perl for simple tasks
|
| (...) Aha, here it is: perl -ane (...) FS is awk is the field separator, not the record separator. The record separator in awk is RS. Hmm, doesn't look like Perl has an input field separator -- only an output field separator $, and input/output (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
