|
| | Re: Retina scanner?
|
| (...) Well, call it an 'eyeball scanner' or something. I suppose I could equally come down on someone who's made a hotdog stand that doesn't really cook hotdogs, or a minifig Outside Broadcast Unit that doesn't really take live video (oh wait a (...) (22 years ago, 7-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: Retina scanner?
|
| Okay, you made a point. It should be called "cornea photographer" or something like that. Robert Seifert (but still, isn't it good approximation? I mean it's still lego, you cannot expect something such sophisticated as retina scanner. That was what (...) (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: Retina scanner?
|
| (...) You can call it nitpicking if you ignore the implications, but it's like saying you've built a fingerprint scanner when what you're actually doing is photographing the _back_ of someone's hand. From a few basic measurements of the image, you (...) (22 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: Retina scanner?
|
| (...) You're right! But, in fact, who cares? I mean, it's kind of nitpicking. In my opinion it's more important if it works or not. Okay, now when I think about it, does it work? Isn't cornea every time little bit different due different light (...) (22 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: math question (or pattern... whatever...)
|
| (...) "Performing these experiments not only gives you some clues, it also slows you down from the common frenzy of everyday life, so you can focus on just one thing for a period of time." ROSCO (22 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |