Subject:
|
Re: How would you move a planet?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sun, 16 Feb 2003 11:53:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
249 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> How to move a planet. That's easy just use the Death Star. Now if you want to
> move it in one piece that is another matter entirely. :-)
>
> > 1. Oooo can we start a Stargate Physics vs. Star Trek Physics debate? I
> > say that a Goauld mothership could take out the Enterprise-D, except that
> > the Goaulds' weak understanding of tactics would make it too easy for the
> > Federation... :-,
>
> The Federation has NO understanding of tactics. First Contact for example,
> they needed Piccard to tell them to concentrate their fire on one spot. Well
> duh.
I thought the story behind that was, that as Locutus, Piccard had insider
knowledge of a borg cube's weakspot, hence it's rapid destruction.
The Cube being basd on a modular repeating redundant structure means you
have to destroy 75% just to deminish it's performance capabilities
(according to an old episode of TNG IIRC).
Their is a breakdown of logic of course, how could a ship with such
redundancy have a singular weakspot?
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: How would you move a planet?
|
| (...) to (...) Obviously this disproves the inital assumption made by Starfleet that the Borg Cube would still be functional with 75% damage. It also shows that a concentrated barrage of fire overwhelms the Borg ability to adapt to energy weapons. (...) (21 years ago, 16-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
