Subject:
|
Re: The Internet (R)*
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 02:44:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
336 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Ross Crawford writes:
> Some more about it:
> http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/stories/story/0,10738,2873149,00.html
Already I refuse to go beyond Win2K because of all the hardware upgrade v.
authentication issues with stuff like WinXP. Plus, I played with it at the
store, what's the big deal except for the transparent colored interface?
Well, I guess I would like that high resolution text thing XP has, but
that's about it. I'd rather they just gave us a single VERY stable OS before
going off to do new things.
Eventually, I am going to go as Linux as I can. Maybe also maintaining a
dual boot to some crappy Windows version or other.
The real problem is that the average users will accept whatever comes with
their hardware package -- even if that's some scary, rights violative OS.
They won't care.
I'm not clear how Paladium could track my activities, but I don't want an OS
that won't let me do pretty much whatever I want to do, whenever I want to
do it. How does it favor me, the consumer, if my actions are dictated by
what my machine will allow me to do? Why should I be paying for this kinda
crap? If they want to surveillance me, I might actually be amenable to it
-- but I want to get paid for that exposure.
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Internet (R)*
|
| (...) Well, we got XP on a box here at work recently, and I've gotta say, IT BOOTS FAST! I can shutdown, restart & log on *5 times* while my NT4 box is booting to the log on screen! But other than that, I can't see much to write home about. (...) My (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
