 | | Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question
|
|
(...) You might have a point. This has suddenly become a full time activity, and is taking alot of time away from other (paying) work. Maybe I should just shut the gallery down to save everyone the trouble of fussing over what's on-topic and allow (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question
|
|
Frank & All, (...) Indeed. (...) I can understand why it is needed, but it is frustrating sometimes. (...) Indeed. I think someone (or several examples) of porn related items, I saw a few of them from time to time, and Kevin decided to make this (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question
|
|
(...) It sounds like we really need a good policy description of what is and is not allowed. I was under the impression that in the past, at least small amounts of personal stuff were allowed (as they help illustrate the person who's LEGO or geeky (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question
|
|
(...) Well put. I think cars can be geeky even if you haven't done unusual things to them. (like some of the tricked out Audis on that one page are) I once had 8 cars under my control (7 that I had title to and one that I just had custody of) but (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Geekshelf Question - Vehicle Question
|
|
(...) I think that what Scott was trying to express is that to some people, cars are inherently geeky; in North America especially. There's lots and lots of people who obsess and geek out about cars, but it's not often refered to that way because (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
