Subject:
|
Re: Digital Camera?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:43:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
227 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In article <GnH17p.16p@lugnet.com>, "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com>
wrote:
> I'm looking into picking up a digital camera and thought some of us here
> might have some good suggestions. I'm a very casual photographer, so I
> don't need built-in X-ray lenses or anything, but can someone recommend a
> good value in the neighborhood of $200-$250? I must confess that I don't
> even know what critera I need to consider, other than "takes nice pictures."
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Dave!
Yes, as has been mentioned, a closeup macro is a very important feature
for photographing LEGO. Also, take note of the focus depth. A few months
ago I was helping one of my fellow SEALUG'ers investigate cameras, and I
think we found that the Nikon models allowed you to get within a few cm
of your subject while still maintaining focus.
HTH
~Grand Admiral Muffin Head
--
Mark's Lego(R) Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Digital Camera?
|
| (...) It's cool because in the macro mode, things *more* than a few centimeters out of where you're focusing are slightly blurry. This lends the impression that the scene is full human scale instead of miniature. (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Digital Camera?
|
| (...) Thank you to everyone for your input. One thing that strikes me as particularly amusing is that everyone is giving suggestions for cameras that photograph LEGO models well, but I should probably have specified that I'd be taking pictures of (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Digital Camera?
|
| I'm looking into picking up a digital camera and thought some of us here might have some good suggestions. I'm a very casual photographer, so I don't need built-in X-ray lenses or anything, but can someone recommend a good value in the neighborhood (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
11 Messages in This Thread: ![Digital Camera? -Dave Schuler (27-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Digital Camera? -Dan Boger (27-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Digital Camera? -Matthew Miller (27-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish.photography)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Digital Camera? -Matthew Miller (27-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Digital Camera? -Dave Schuler (28-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Digital Camera? -Mark Sandlin (28-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Digital Camera? -Richard Marchetti (29-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Digital Camera? -Martin Scragg (29-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Digital Camera? -Matthew Miller (29-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Digital Camera? -Ronan Webb (30-Nov-01 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|