Subject:
|
Re: Remaining parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Jan 2001 17:35:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
230 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Yes. The thing you're missing is that pieces rarely are missing. The scale
> is there as a check. Further, the bag is weighed after every insertion step,
> or so the stuff we've read seems to imply.
I actually left out some other possibilities for small error. The weight
of the bag itself is certainly an opportunity for error. Another
opportunity of course is if any foreign material or scrap gets into a
bag or on the scale. Of course this type of manufacturing system
typically runs in a pretty clean environment (that may actually be part
of the motivation behind the automation, people can bring in a lot of
incidental trash - ask anyone who has volunteered at a show cave [like
Carlsbad Caverns] which has annual cleanups. They remove bags of lint
from the caves).
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Remaining parts
|
| (...) Yes. The thing you're missing is that pieces rarely are missing. The scale is there as a check. Further, the bag is weighed after every insertion step, or so the stuff we've read seems to imply. As soon as a problem is noted, it's time to (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
