| |
Tim Courtney wrote:
>
> Is Millenium the home user version like 9x has been? Or is it network-
> oriented too like 2k??
Millennium is just a new win9x with some additional bells and whistles
and will not have any "revolutionary" new things. I doubt the
difference between win98 and millennium will be more than the difference
between win95 and win98. Of course it would be probably a little bit
more stable and free of some very obvious security holes and bugs that
win98 already have, but I don't think we could call it "network
oriented" as in the sense of winNT or win2k.
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Windows 2000
|
| On Wed, 19 Jul 2000 2:09:01 -0600, Selçuk Göre wrote (in message <3975621D.DD740346@s...ine.com>): (...) I'd agree there. WinME (Millenium Edition) is more of an evolution than a revolution. Win2000 is the bomb IMHO. (He said, typing on his G4 Mac. (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
| In lugnet.cad, Ben Vaughan writes: snip [...] (...) Ben (& everyone) thanks for the pointers. I'll do a little more research as I have a week or so before I can borrow an external SCSI burner for the backup job. I think I'm leaning towards 2k (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
