| | Re: Digital Camera?
|
|
(...) Yes, as has been mentioned, a closeup macro is a very important feature for photographing LEGO. Also, take note of the focus depth. A few months ago I was helping one of my fellow SEALUG'ers investigate cameras, and I think we found that the (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: Digital Camera?
|
|
(...) Definitely. It's also good to have one that takes good pictures in low light, since you want to avoid using a flash with lego. (Too shiny.) Check out (URL) for good digital camera reviews. (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
|
| | Re: Digital Camera?
|
|
(...) pictures." (...) I don't really have any suggestions, just some pointers... we use a Mavica-FD88 for all our pictures, and found that for LEGO, a macro capability is very very important - zoom much less so. We also like saving the data to a (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Digital Camera?
|
|
I'm looking into picking up a digital camera and thought some of us here might have some good suggestions. I'm a very casual photographer, so I don't need built-in X-ray lenses or anything, but can someone recommend a good value in the neighborhood (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | newsticker
|
|
Dunno if anyone will be interested in this, but I wrote a small newsticker app: (URL) designed as a netscape6/mozilla sidebar, but can work on any browser - if you cannot use sidebars, it'll just pop up as a new window. :) Dan (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek) !!
|
|
| | Re: Spot the movie reference
|
|
(...) That's correct! I think perhaps the puppetmaster gets stolen after he sees the tape, but I'm not quite sure. (I have a copy on DivX which I can check at home...) I chose that scene because it is easy to capture, with a static camera and few (...) (23 years ago, 17-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: Spot the movie reference
|
|
(...) Wow! I never get these obscure references, usually! It's the surveillance tape of the diplomats coming out of the parking garage that the Major is watching, after they've stolen the puppetmaster. :) Cool. thanks, James (23 years ago, 16-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: Spot the movie reference
|
|
(...) Yep, that's exactly correct! Fredrik (23 years ago, 16-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: Spot the movie reference
|
|
(...) Ghost in the Shell? It's the first thing I thought of, but I discarded it, because I think you're looking for something older. thanks, James (23 years ago, 16-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: Spot the movie reference
|
|
(...) You are definitively moving in the right direction. For the origin of this particular movie, you'll need to look outside USA. Also, this movie does not feature live actors; it is animated. Fredrik (23 years ago, 16-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: Spot the movie reference
|
|
At first I thought it was the sequence with David Bowie in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me. I put in the movie again and realised I was wrong. I'm stumped. Although I imagine it has something to do with sci fi. It looks like the two individuals are (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: Spot the movie reference
|
|
(...) Sliding Doors? (23 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Spot the movie reference
|
|
Here's a challenge for you all. I have captured a scene from a 90's movie in a LEGO animation. The characters in the movie are substituted with LEGO figures, obviously. The movie isn't exactly a blockbuster, but it does have a significant appeal in (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: more problems with Netscrape 6.2
|
|
(...) This is far from my area of expertise, but I've seen it in all of those places. Maybe version-of-mswindows related, maybe version-of-mozilla. (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: more problems with Netscrape 6.2
|
|
(...) I can't get IE to work at all anymore, perhaps someone could help me out. Everytime I try to use it I get a DNS error. Aol 6 works fine. Steve (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: more problems with Netscrape 6.2
|
|
(...) want (...) data\mozilla\profiles (...) I believe it's c:\windows\mozilla\users\... :) Dan (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: more problems with Netscrape 6.2
|
|
(...) Sounds like there was some corruption in your user profile. You might want to delete that and try again -- C:\windows\application data\mozilla\profiles or C:\windows\all users\application data\mozilla\profiles or somewhere. (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: more problems with Netscrape 6.2
|
|
(...) But it's the emacs way to include those things with your text editor. (...) Not exactly, but there's a similar project: (URL) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET found on serach engine...
|
|
(...) Interesting, my first two pages are my way out of date AOL pages. At least my top level Lego page shows up third. Interestingly, it has a description and category tag, who puts those there? It shows up as #48 in the Recreation > Collecting > (...) (23 years ago, 10-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
| | Re: more problems with Netscrape 6.2
|
|
(...) Oh. I thought 10 = X (more specifically, 10 was ramped up for OSX) (...) I think I'll just do that:-) Thanks! -John It seems to work (...) (23 years ago, 10-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|