 | | All LUG's/LTC's with registered domains - Especially those at Pair Networks!
|
|
All, While visiting the Pair Networks Website ( www.pair.com ) recently I found they have recently started their own Domain Registration Service call PairNIC ( www.pairnic.com ). Their prices are very good running from between $19 for 1 year to as (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.org, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML URL question
|
|
(...) I like it when website designers use relative URLs. On WebTV, when a link is highlighted, you press crtl + cmd to see the target address; however, you're limited to the number of characters displayed in the little window, so the final (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML URL question
|
|
(...) Great, that was the answer I was hoping for. It will be alot easier for me to script from an absolute reference than it will for me to constantly figure out the relative position of a given page. --Jim (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Networking Round 2
|
|
(...) Oh! Another thing: I wouldn't use local.com unless you actually own local.com and the root nameservers point to you to resolve local.com. But I don't _think_ that's what's causing your problem. I'd use something with a domain that doesn't (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Networking Round 2
|
|
(...) This may be a stupid question, but you didn't mention it: do you have your /etc/resolv.conf pointing in the right place? -JDF (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML URL question
|
|
(...) As efficiency goes, no, it doesn't really make a whole lot of difference-- that all happens on the browser end and in today's world of piles o' graphics and javascript and ActiveX controls and who knows what else, a couple of strncmp()s and a (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | HTML URL question
|
|
Heres a question; I am working of some web site scripting and wonder if any of you know which is more effecient to call; a) an absolute reference, e.g <a href="(URL) or b) a relative reference e.g. <a href="../../history.html"> Or doesnt it make any (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Networking: Round 1
|
|
(...) Mmm, postfix. Good for you, good for the earth, good good good. (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Networking Round 2
|
|
(...) hmmm.... looks like named couldn't bind to port 53 - is there anything else bound to that port? perhaps inet or some other named proccess? Dan (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Free server with CGI?
|
|
Bram Lambrecht <bram@cwru.edu> schreef in berichtnieuws G7DD83.4ty@lugnet.com... (...) their (...) <> (...) (URL) MB of webspace and CGI-access. Saskia (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Networking: Round 1
|
|
(...) Or 3, but I admit hyperbole. :) (Three at the office for most things, two at home. Got a serial number in a weird place at the office...) (...) Bah. I'm convinced even Eric Allman doesn't _really_ understand sendmail. Me, I just remember those (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Networking: Round 1
|
|
(...) if you're scripting, why not just write a script that would edit your files for you? that way, you run one command, and it'll update the 14 (or 2 :) files that need updates... (...) even sendmail is manageable - it just needs a little love :) (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Networking: Round 1
|
|
(...) Well, yeah. Someone _desperately_ needs to come up with a scaleable solution that doesn't involve fourteen different file mungings to change a single entry. Some folks in the local Linux enthusiasts group wrote "DENTS", which was supposed to (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Networking: Round 1
|
|
(...) oh, of course - learning how to set up dns and deal with it is every's geek duty :) I was just saying that for a smallish setup, it is more hassle than it's worth... aside from the learning part :) Dan (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Networking: Round 1
|
|
(...) Geek value. :) Actually, there can be some real uses, too. Sure, if it's just four or five machines, it's easy to keep up a hosts file on each of them. One of the things I wanted my home network to be able to do, though, was handle the "LAN (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Networking: Round 1
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:3AB0C8D8.10401@...ron.com... (...) True, but for centralised management DNS makes life much easier. Dan (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
