|
|
 | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| (...) I've got the 3000, got it for $700 from Amazon after using $300 in gift certs. I'm thrilled with the camera - pictures are awesome, HUGE, and easy to take. The included 340mb IBM Microdrive can hold so many pictures I've never been forced to (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| "Erik Olson" <olsone@spamcop.net> wrote in message news:G6B5IB.IC1@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) with (...) I have the D490 and I am very happy with it. It is awesome with respect to batteries. I have had it since September, have (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| (...) Don't do it. Floppies that is. Depending on how much money you have to spend on a camera: $100 -- you'll get a webcam, or a used Kodak from 1997 with grainy 320x240 pictures. $200 -- Better webcams like the irez.com types with 640x480 but (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Free? Website?
|
| Kenneth A. Drumm Ph.D. wrote in message ... (...) of (...) Try Homestead... you can set it so the ad is just a small footer at the bottom of your page (not in a frame or popup window) so most people never even see it. This is an example: (URL) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Free? Website?
|
| (...) Do they still demand that you give them a mail address to which they can send ads? That was te case when I used Xoom a year ago or so. Fredrik (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Free? Website?
|
| I use xoom.com (NSBi.com). They have a banner ad at the top, but it's small & loads fast (I'm using 56K modem). Limit of 11 megs I think. I havent reached it yet 8?) Regards, ROSCO (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| If you are thinking about the Sony Mavica, consider the Olympus C3000/C3030, incredibly good image quality, 3.3 Megapixel images, 16 or so possible quality settings, I use the HQ setting and a 64MB smartmedia card to get over 80 shots before I need (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| ummm, the Mars Exploration Expansion Pack doesn't come with a camera at all... from what i have heard it pretty much sucks. just a few parts that are cool and the longest wires you canget that is all. m. (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Tractor beam?
|
| (...) I was, I just know better than to stick my neck into religious debates! 8-) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Tractor beam?
|
| (...) The term may be older, but I am positive of its reference in the Lensman series. He also used "pressor", "force field/shield" and many other SF terms used commonly today. Wayne (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| (...) Casio. 2000 or 3000. USB, CMF-II, Real glass lenses, Builds webpages with thumbs on the camera(optional Javascript versions), Shutter modes, Panoramma. Could go on... 2000 is not an *action* camera, 3000 is better for sports/action and 3megpix (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| "Rainer Balzerowski" <balze2@gmx.net> wrote in message news:G6ALIG.JtH@lugnet.com... (...) 2)Vision (...) what (...) our (...) Yup. (...) Nope. (...) better) Really? (...) Sure!! Email me at Arcanamachi@netzero.net Hows about sending me the same (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| (...) You want to buy a vision command set to use the camera for photographing our lego inventions, right ??? Have you ever seen an image made with such a camera ?? (It's a logitech webcam, i find the results from my cheap noname webcam better) If (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Tractor beam?
|
| (...) Na... who cares about the mundanes? (...) And I believe I answered the question. (...) You should be so lucky. <bigger grin> (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Tractor beam?
|
| (...) What's fantasy got to do with it? Just because bookstores misfile David Eddings in the SF section doesn't make fantasy science fiction. As for using SF vs. scifi, it's simple. It's an insider vs. outsider thing, if you call it scifi, you're (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Tractor beam?
|
| (...) If you think *that's* a futile argument, you should have stopped by OT.DEBATE a week or two ago! Dave! (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Tractor beam?
|
| (...) Gee Lar, Do you want to ask Todd to add .o-t.geek.mundane and .o-t.geek.real? ;-) BTW: He was looking for who started using that term, not where the idea came from. Wow, I am beginning to sound like you. <grin> Jude (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Tractor beam?
|
| (...) OK, I've got to ask, what's the big deal about this? I'm harldy a scifi mundane but I find it easier to refer to Science Fiction as scifi (because it's shorter) than SF (because everyone looks at you and asks what SF means). The whole (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Tractor beam?
|
| (...) Well, they wouldn't be mundanes if they weren't common! :-) ++Lar (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Tractor beam?
|
| (...) Ah! That sounds familiar. I had originally thought of Star Trek but I had a sense that it was older. (...) Certainly not, but I'm surrounded by them here at work... Dave! (24 years ago, 28-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
