 | | cheese racing
|
|
(URL) think I'll stick to playing with LEGO. -Tim (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | ººººNigh-Omnipotent ‘Scrappin’ Simian Sinner.’ ºººº
|
|
~So I've decided to compile an updated list of all the past-posts regarding the notorious adventures of the ever so nigh-omnipotent ‘scrappin’ simian sinner.’ (In the history of the written word, has a finer sentence ever been crafted?) And yes, I (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Part x176
|
|
(...) Shhhh! We don't [buy] want the masses to realise [more] that ldraw.org is really a [technic] front for a fearfully powerful [lego] money-making machine! (...) Well done! I don't think they suspect anything at all, do you? FUT: .o-t.fun ROSCO (22 years ago, 3-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Name calling: a catharsis.
|
|
(...) But that's not necessarily SPAM unless the people receiving it didn't ask for it. Though the page linked does outline some legitimate uses for bulk e-mail, they probably are used by spammers as well. ROSCO (22 years ago, 1-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Name calling: a catharsis.
|
|
(...) (URL) E-Mail - Send the same e-mail message (or one with custom merged information) simultaneously to hundreds, thousands or millions of destinations. " And that's a far worse insult, if unfounded, than anything you've come up with! ++Lar who (...) (22 years ago, 1-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A few questions...
|
|
(...) That is always nice to see, a marriage based on bribery. :-) Jude XFUT o-t.fun (22 years ago, 1-May-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor Online game
|
|
Wow, am I the only Lugnetter who plays this game? Currently, I'm looking for hints on how to defeat the Taskmaster at the Slave Camp. -Joel (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Name calling: a catharsis.
|
|
(...) That is, after all, the first step in overcoming it... (...) A hit! A very palpable hit! (...) Hey, credit where credit is due: (URL) One or two of those clever rejoinders were MOC's, but I thought I would flesh it out with a little help from (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Name calling: a catharsis.
|
|
(...) hehe I prefer the "Insultinator" "You're a totally gross, boring, nerd" (default insult) -John (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Name calling: a catharsis.
|
|
(...) Cruelly??? hardly. I was trying to help you get the help you need by acknowledging your bravery in admitting that you were disturbed. You misconstrue me, sir. Wet noodles at 20 paces at dawn, you shall be hearing from my second. (...) Wit (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Name calling: a catharsis.
|
|
After Larry P cruelly lashed out at me during a recent ultra-serious debate: (URL) feel it would not be inappropriate for me to let fly with a little monikerizing myself. To wit: Larry P is a fobbing, loud-whispering, common-kissing, gorbellied, (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Modules, Can You Help? (Was Re: Possible BOO BOO)
|
|
(...) Was that footnote gonna contain useful info? 8?) FUT .o-t.fun ROSCO (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Ocker (was: Attack of the Compartmentalization)
|
|
(...) Check (URL) .off-topic.fun ROSCO (22 years ago, 27-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: §Infer Monkeys for Parrots!§
|
|
(...) Excellent, We move into action upon daybreak! (I've already been in conversation with B 1 & B 2... They want in on our campaign. They appear to have a personal vendetta against these foul feces throwers.) (URL) Let the liberation begin, (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: §Infer Monkeys for Parrots!§
|
|
mo's treatise on monkeys: Monkeys are evil to their very brown cores. Monkeys can do everything we can do, but better (they're just lazy, is all). It would not surprise me to learn that at least one monkey is sitting on the LEGO Company's board of (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | §Infer Monkeys for Parrots!§
|
|
~Infer Monkeys for Parrots! (My Gawd, we’re the same person?) {see comments within…} (URL) see comments below..} (...) What kinda sick *monkey fetish* do we share? Is it the feces throwin’ thing… cause I'm not into that! And another thing, why are (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Both sides!
|
|
But as I assume the Patent and Trademark office have yet to grant registration of Stubbies then they cannot use the ® symbol, and as they do not manufacture the product themselves they cannot claim tm on it either. However seeing as it is a creative (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor Online game
|
|
(...) They're in Toys R Us, and they are Barbie dolls with Technic peg connectors. (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Both sides!
|
|
(...) Ummm, coypright is for creative works, not trademarks or service marks. Trademarks would get (TM) or (R). But I bet you new that and you were just following the rule that all corrections must themselves contain an error... --Bill. (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Galidor Online game
|
|
Hello, I haven't seen the Galidor sets yet, so I have no idea how good they are, but I've been enjoying the online RPG game at www.galidor.com. I am stuck in a few places, however, and have been trying in vain to find some hints for the game. Would (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
