Subject:
|
Re: Both sides!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 00:45:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
513 times
|
| |
|
|
"Matthew Gerber" <Matthew@BlockType.com> writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, David Brandes writes:
> > This is one of the greatest things I've seen since the shorter legs ...
>
> *Ahem!* Stubbies©...
Ummm, coypright is for creative works, not trademarks or service
marks. Trademarks would get (TM) or (R).
But I bet you new that and you were just following the rule that all
corrections must themselves contain an error...
--Bill.
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Both sides!
|
| But as I assume the Patent and Trademark office have yet to grant registration of Stubbies then they cannot use the ® symbol, and as they do not manufacture the product themselves they cannot claim tm on it either. However seeing as it is a creative (...) (23 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
