 | | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
|
(...) I am 0K with that as long as I get to take my toys. Satan no doubt will put me in charge of torturing dour Scotsmen who ask too many questions or some similarly small group, and one of them will no doubt be in charge of torturing *me*. (no one (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
|
(...) Trust me, if I ever say "could care less" there's an IMPLIED "but not much less" tacked on there.... (I am reminded, completely non apropos, of "Ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put." Can you name the (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
|
(...) 'Long as they've got a good supply of Vegemite, and heat-resistant technic beams, I'll be happy... ROSCO (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
|
Ross: I just want you to know that Maggie, Larry, and yourself are all going to end up in hell. Grammar is of no consequence -- meaning is what matters. =oP -- Hop-Frog (wondering how this lugnut version of "No Exit" turns out) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
|
(...) c /could/couldn't/ or c /could care less/could care less, but not much,/ 8?) ROSCO FUT: wherever... (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Most of the rest of this is pretty depressing PCness but I am totally behind this particular idea, where do I send my donations? :-) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Interpretation of history
|
|
(...) ROFLMAO!!! Thanks for posting this, Ross! :-) -Tim (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Interpretation of history
|
|
(...) This is semi-apocryphal; call it a quasi-UL. It's been around for some time--the addition of numerals before the points is the part that's new to me. (AFAIK, that was added this year.) The original is at least 25 years old, and probably older; (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Interpretation of history
|
|
With all the talk of historical events in .debate, I thought you might all appreciate the following interpretations of history. Sorry about the formatting. WARNING: Do not read these with food or drink in your mouth, or if you're doing something (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: More voting( Re: More Shamelessly Insisting I Get What I Want
|
|
(...) Perhaps we may view the ill-structured sentence as containing a non-terminating Dave! A reason to avoid this construction is that there is no guarantee of rationality, whereas the implication of rationality CAN be made given the existence of a (...) (23 years ago, 27-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
