 | | Re: Xenogears Sequel? Nope, Prequel!
|
|
Well, some more information has surfaced, revealing that Xenosaga is not a sequel, but a *prequel*. Specifically, it will be episode 1 of the six part Xeongears storyline (Xenogears itself was episode V). There is evidence that the game will span (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Mark's Lego Creations Update! 4/01/01
|
|
(...) And let's not forget Dan Fielding the Klingon, either! Dave! (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Mark's Lego Creations Update! 4/01/01
|
|
(...) way (...) No, if you're mentioning Jim Ignatowski / Christopher Lloyd, it most certainly does still belong here...after all, who *didn't* see Star Trek III and think 'My goodness, is that Jim Ignatowski the Klingon...?' I mean, besides various (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Mark's Lego Creations Update! 4/01/01
|
|
(...) Hey, stop ruining my fun. ;) (...) Human error. -- dataAndrew (URL) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Trolling
|
|
(...) Nice! D-Man (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Trolling
|
|
(URL) Lieutenant, Fleebnork Division Muffin Head (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Mark's Lego Creations Update! 4/01/01
|
|
(...) Jim Ignakowski (sp?) from Taxi is weird (the character played by Christopher Lloyd). I do not know if this belongs in .space so I am gonna move this to o-t.fun. Jude BTW, how could you have destroyed a ship you *made* that was not finished? (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: All your phenomenon are belong to us
|
|
"Jason J. Railton" <j.j.railton@cwcom.net> wrote in message news:GB65pK.51o@lugnet.com... (...) Heh. I agree, the speech bubble stuff, uhh, SUCKS. Its much more creative and entertaining when effort is put into integrating 'All Your Base' into (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: All your phenomenon are belong to us
|
|
(...) Only in that it's appallingly bad! It's a truly dreadful attempt to gain attention for revenue advertising, and the standard of items submitted is pathetic! How much skill does it take to load up a random bitmap, paint a speech bubble onto it (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: All your phenomenon are belong to us
|
|
"Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message news:GB35Cq.99I@lugnet.com... (...) much (...) Oh... guess I'm a bit late. :-) Anyways, that site is hilarious! -Tim (24 years ago, 1-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
