|
|
 | | Re: Straight Roundness (was Re: Does God have a name for God?)
|
| (...) Hmm. I guess it depends on how rigid the spinning object is, and what you're using as a standard of comparison. If there's no actual axis, but a "net" axis, the rotation might change. Intesting. Dave! (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Straight Roundness (was Re: Does God have a name for God?)
|
| (...) But when it wobbles would the axis change? I guess the easiest way to test the theory would be to draw a bright red line along the equator of a globe and give the ol girl a good spin and then see if the line stays the same or blurs whilst it's (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
| (...) I think it must have been a small tank. :-) (and therefore one that wouldn't do well in a wreck with a bigger tank, but I digress) IIRC, an M1A1 gets about 3 gallons (of Jet A to run its turbines, I think it is) per mile... ++Lar (who drives a (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
| (...) People joke that way about the cars I've owned, a 1970 Olds Cutlass, a 1981 Chevrolet Suburban, a 1970 Plymouth Fury, a 1999 Dodge Dakota R/T, and a 1969 Dodge Coronet. Hey, they think it's amusing. Me, I know that except in one case, I had (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
| (...) Hehe. Once back many years ago, I looked up to see if tanks got miles per gallon or gallons per mile. I forget which tank I actually looked up, but it still got miles per gallon, but just barely... :-) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
| Christian Gemuenden <xtian@brickmaster.de> wrote in message news:GAy1Ip.K1y@lugnet.com... (...) would (...) It looks pretty real to me. Where did you get the image from? Huw (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Offtopic .. outgassing
|
| (...) Like comp.sys.sinclair out on usenet has a large number of Andys? (Really like anyone here would understand that! Ed.) Alex (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
| (...) You say that like it's a bad thing.... -JDF (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
| (...) Yep. The cash difference between 5000 USD for a reasonably good example of mid 60's muscle and 50,000 USD for a reasonably good example of a mid 60's eurosupercar (and I am being optimistic) will buy you a heck of a lot of gasoline... So ya. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GAxG1H.HCz@lugnet.com... <snip> although eurosupercars are cool, '60s american muscle is cooler.... Safer, (felt) faster, way cheaper, way easier to work on, and way more (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
