 | | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) Whoa... :[ KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Benevolent Grace Hull Finished today!
|
|
"Erin Windross" <e-windross@home.com> wrote in message news:GAq6ys.EIF@lugnet.com... (...) Whoa, um, weird. Reminds me, I gotta read HHGTTG sometime...never finished it (!!) -Tim (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Benevolent Grace Hull Finished today!
|
|
www.starshiptitanic.com Erin -- (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Benevolent Grace Hull Finished today!
|
|
(...) "not even God himself could blow up this ship.." a few weeks later it runs into an asteroid or something. -Tim (in a really dorky mood) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Censoring Unpopular Speech? (Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!))
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, James Simpson writes: Forgive my bad etiquette in replying to my own post, but I neglected to set FUT to debate. james (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Censoring Unpopular Speech? (Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!))
|
|
(...) This censorship topic reminds me of something that my mom told me about a couple of weeks ago; it seems that she was listening to AM talk radio at some unusual hour, and found a program devoted to cigar enthusiasts - as its often fun to listen (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
|
|
(...) Get stuffed! : ) (...) That's cool. A lot of rockets, aimed for..... Anyway, you can have fun with politics combined. I liked this site. (URL) ) A lot of people thought this funny, even moderates and Democrats that I know. Better. Scott S. -- (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
|
|
(...) Death to political discussion in .fun! Death to it! Death! Death! With nasty sharp pointy teeth! love and rockets, LFB FUT->.o-t.debate (actually, responding to what I wrote might qualify it for ".fun" again. Or ".monty-python"... (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
|
|
(...) Interesting response. I wasn't trying to be political (thus why I didn't identify Armey by party or state). But I went to Armey because, at one time, he was having problems with censorware blindly blocking him. (Apparently it's been fixed, (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
|
|
(...) Then why make the inaccurate claim and why respond? His continuous right-wing stands make his true colors apparent. Support for censorship is just another example. Bruce (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
|
|
Bruce, (...) Whatever Bruce. I don't think so.His leftword move to the left this election campaign showed his true colors, IMO. But I digress, I don' feel like talking about it. FUT to off.topic.debate, and you guys and talk about it. I will not be (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
|
|
(...) Lieberman is a conservative. Why he is in the Democratic party is beyond me. Bruce (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
|
|
Lindsey, (...) Tit for tat. B&V does not block his site. I am sure I can get on it with cleanweb as well. Anyway, I know a few liberals that love censorship as well, like Libermann (SP?), for instance, where I disagree with some of the conservative (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
|
|
(...) You can always go check the site of Senator Dick Armey, who is one of the staunchest proponents of censorware...oh, wait. His site is blocked out by all known filter programs. ;) There's a site devoted to censorware foibles, including a high (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Stuff (Was: some other stuff)
|
|
(...) I heard someone in outer London last month refer to it as needing to "dyson" the floor. !?! The man creates one silly innovation and suddenly he's a verb. [Re: Gosport, it looks like I'll be in the UK, but whether I can afford to get there, (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Stuff (Was: some other stuff)
|
|
(...) But it's only at its best wiv a PROpper INGlish accent mate, nartymean?. (Coming to Gosport btw?) Anyway, I've got to hoover the floor... And another thing, it's "attendees" that really winds me up. It's not a word, and it's the wrong way (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter?
|
|
(...) I just don't remember it being so bluntly obvious as the Iron Tower trilogy was. Perhaps there was some difference in frame of mind when I read them (but note that I did read the Iron Tower trilogy much later than I did Sword of Shanara, and (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter?
|
|
(...) Brooks had scene-for-scene, character-for-character matches (in the same sequence as LOTR) - geez, a fellowship with four little guys, one dwarf, one elf, two men, and a wizard, for heaven's sake. He just added new names, and that was about (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter?
|
|
(...) But the Iron Tower trilogy which was written to give the base series for the later books to rest on had incredible correlation with Lord of the Rings. It seemed like every major scene had a parallel in Lord of the Rings. FUT: (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Music while building
|
|
(...) This is effectively what I've done, though my CD collection is an order of magnitude smaller. I basically set up an encoder to encode as I played them, and eventually pretty much everything was on the hard disk. As I get new CDs, I play them (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
