 | | Re: Michigan STATE is second RATE (was Re: For Sale: Mindstorms RIS 1.5 $160 inc. shp.
|
|
(...) I saw that lame attempt to convert the verb "to try" coming, I just didn't expect *you* to resort to it! For shame. ;) As for most Michiganders/anians being U-M fans, I disagree--in-state, I see more MSU fans. However, unlike U-M's fan base, (...) (26 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Michigan STATE is truly GREAT ;) (was Re: For Sale: Mindstorms RIS 1.5 $160 inc. shp.
|
|
(...) It is very nice, but I found the University itself very leftist leaning. U of M is in downtown Ann Arbor, which I try to avoid like the plague, since I work and live about 10 minutes away from. Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> (...) (26 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Michigan STATE is truly GREAT ;) (was Re: For Sale: Mindstorms RIS 1.5 $160 inc. shp.
|
|
(...) The line said "tried," not "trying." I've mostly found U-M/Ann Arborites to be the trying ones. Of course, I've never been found wanting. (...) Actually, the "chief of staff" over at Princeton's department was an OSU grad, so she and I would (...) (26 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
|
(...) "Aaaah! Suffice to say, 'tis the one word the Knights cannot stand to hear!" -LFB (26 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
|
(...) Not to insult or something, but being immortal is much more than 200 years. It's for eternity. If you can't grasp eternity, think 1 million years. (which is nothing compared to eternity.) Think of this - everybody you know dies. You meet new (...) (26 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
|
(...) LOL! :) Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems Administrator/CAD Operator-Affiliated Engineers -> (URL) Page -> (URL) Page -> (URL) (26 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
|
(...) put"... (...) an (...) German has (...) and all (...) about "no (...) to (...) infinitive (...) before you know (...) started on (...) write them. (...) correctness--it's (...) and it's (...) that created (...) "split (...) have you (...) two (...) (26 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
|
(...) "We" (who?) already are saying those things, statistically. We just shouldn't write them. What do you mean, "giving in?" This isn't even an issue of grammatical correctness--it's an issue of style. There is no rule in English that prohibits (...) (26 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
|
(...) What part of speech would it be then, exactly? (...) That's not really a strong argument, because why should the "literate" minority hold sway over the masses? Seems kind of elitist to me. Further, that slippery-slope reasoning is inherently (...) (26 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
|
(...) While that is technically the generally accepted spelling, if I had suggested that correction, would Craigo have been able to riff on it, enabling my cliff-hanger of a riposte?? I think NOT. You mortals just don't think far enough ahead. :-) (...) (26 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
