 | | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) Feeling sheepish? (Lamenting your reply even as I type that...) (or is that lamb-menting your reply instead? Hmm...) (...) Micronauts, I'd say! But as far as the juniorization argument goes, I'd suggest that the pre-formed elements (head and (...) (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Ewe know that punning only goats me on! Now bleat it, or wool have to get shearious with you, Dave! (...) I see your point, and yet I can't come up with another term for it. I believe both ideas are encompassed by the term. (...) Spin me (...) (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) The greatest tragedy in all of this is that I was staring right at a perfect double pun and totally flubbed it: "lamenting" should have been "lamb-minting." Way to miss the easy one, Dave! (...) Sure, in the absence of another term, I'd agree. (...) (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, way to go, Dave! That one was money in the bank. Now, if you'd be so kind as to explain it.... (...) ??? Does such a person exist? Has such an intellect ever existed??? <consults Magic 8 Ball> "Outlook not so good". Okay, yes, I know (...) (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Well, mint jelly and all that... (...) We've decided that we're just going to skip those. (...) No, but if I'd used the official designation of Mega-Scale Mega Bloks, I'm not sure that you'd have known what I meant. Duplo is "Mega-Scale" LEGO, (...) (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) "and all that"? I'm missing the jelly-nexus (But I like that term for a band name!) (...) You are a wise man, Dave! (...) You're right! For starters, I would have complained about your redundancy... (...) I'm filing that info in my Rolodex (...) (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building? —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | Snip... (...) I'm just dyeing to bobbin here to string you guys along unless, of course, you'd prefer me knot in which case I'll bale. -Rob (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Hey, it doesn't modder to me one whey or the udder, Rob! JOHN (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building? —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | (...) I'm sew plaid you awl seam it that way. -Rob (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) (URL) We've> suspected as much. (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building? —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | (...) Wouldn't that have been "weave"? -Rob (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Three-fer-one: "We've" "Weave" "We.tv" I'm so punny, I've got myself in stitches! JOHN (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
