To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 10273 (-20)
  Re: A question of VITAL importance:
 
(...) I admit, my inherent bias crept its way into this poll. Since I don't like crunchy peanut butter, I hadn't considered that the others that like creamy (like me) would ALSO like crunchy. Let me tell ya, writing a non-biased poll ain't easy. But (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: emoticons ;)
 
(...) [snip] good ones! (...) Are you the guy who people referenced with something like that on RTL back in the day? I recall Todd telling me about someone spitting out a bunch of smilies like that, or maybe he did it himself as well. Back when I (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: A New Poll (Re: A question of VITAL importance:)
 
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Dave Schuler writes: <snip> (...) Take off the ! and I agree with that one Dave K (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: emoticons ;)
 
(...) It was one of my first experiences with, what was then known as BBS's-- I printed out a list (5 pages of fanfold printed off a 9 pin Panasonic connected to my Commodore 64) of smileys-- I may still have it somewhere in a binder but there's (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  A New Poll (Re: A question of VITAL importance:)
 
(...) Please rate the following statement: I believe that Larry can go a day without criticizing a poll. __ I Strongly Agree __ I Somewhat Strongly Agree __ I Somewhat Less Strongly Agree __ I Agree Somewhat Less Strongly Than That __ I Thought That (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: emoticons ;)
 
(...) How else are the mer-people going to get their presents? &:-) guy with a squirrel on his head -Tim XFUT -> o-t.fun (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: A question of VITAL importance:
 
(...) Like shooting fish in a barrel. :) But, yes, yes I can. Why, I did't criticise any yesterday, or the day before. I let both of Sean's slide. Hey, I can quit anytime I want. (...) Creamy being good and chunky being evil? or are you a chunky (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  A fun effect for a web site...
 
Here is one of my web sites that has a cool effect which I'd like to share: (Disclaimer, the site is in development and the flame logo totally sucks against my custom background, so please disregard the disguting contrast and focus on the effect I (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: A question of VITAL importance:
 
(...) Can't go a day without criticizing a poll, eh? :) My personal belief is that it's like the force. You're either good or you're evil :) Adrian (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: A question of VITAL importance:
 
I rekon its rigged in favour of evil 'smooth' peanut butter .. I demand a recount (when it finishes and if smooth wins of course) -- James Stacey ------ www.minifig.co.uk Lugnet Member #925 I'm a citizen of Legoland travellin' Incommunicado "Bruce (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: A question of VITAL importance:
 
(...) Bruce, this is a family-friendly forum. Please take your pottymouth elsewhere. Dave! (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: A question of VITAL importance:
 
(...) And should it be Lugneteer? I can just see the slightly bent minifig names: Acehole, Porthole, Err Amis, and Dark'Tanya. -->But I Like Reese's Pieces<-- (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: A question of VITAL importance:
 
(...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  A question of VITAL importance:
 
We're talking life or death, here. (URL) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Trademarks and misspellings.... oh my! (WAS:Re: Where did the lego's go?)
 
(...) I'm not sure what "lacking sharp distinctness or clarity" has to do with being serious or not. ;) Sincerely... but not seriously, Allan B. (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Trademarks and misspellings.... oh my! (WAS:Re: Where did the lego's go?)
 
(...) C'mon Allan, he calls himself "Fuzzy"-- how serious can he be? :-) Maggie C. (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Trademarks and misspellings.... oh my! (WAS:Re: Where did the lego's go?)
 
WARNING: Overly analytical and highly anal retentive reply follows. :) (...) I guess my honest and sincere response to that statement would be: Why wouldn't you expect to be taken seriously? If you reread your posting: (URL) much of the message you (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Proverb of Today
 
"When in danger, when in doubt: Run in circles, scream and shout!" I read it in a footer of a message somewhere on the net. I just love it! (24 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Trademarks and misspellings.... oh my! (WAS:Re: Where did the lego's go?)
 
(...) Man, I had no idea anyone EVER took what I said seriously. : ) Just so everyone knows, whenever I post ANYTHING on the internet (here, there, anywhere), it's not meant to be taken too seriously. It's just the internet, and I've never met (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Dune (was: Which was better? was: Excellent summation of truths and falsehoods about...)
 
(...) I got 50ish pages into 'Children of Dune' and absolutely hated it. I thought that Dune and CoD were written by two completely different people. Then I went and read Foundation all over again and thought that this would make a great (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR