Results 1161 – 1180 of 1284.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: An Alternative..
|
| (...) Please don't hold back on the questions :) (...) I have to respectfully disagree! * Power is bottom up, not top down. * State Funding is at a minimum - you pay for what you want. * Individuals are offered a role in community issues and at a (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
political
(score: 0.256)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| Richard, (...) Well, I think money (Which is a form of trading) has been around since the beginning of mankind. If man has nothing to trade with, which is 100% tax, I don't think it would work. I would that would happen, but we will see. (...) Well, (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| | Re: RFC: An Alternative..
|
| (...) The shift of power from top-down to bottom-up is a major difference straight off. The Social Groupings that I named will sound familiar, as we do have a structure already in place for community and society.. I could have used different terms (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| | RFC: An Alternative..
|
| Disclaimers ===...=== First off, I don't have the benefit of being incredibly smart, so there are bound to be holes. But even the simplest idea can spark others into greater feats of insight and imagination - hopefully that will be the case. I (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| Lindsay, I seem to be repeating myself. But anyway... (...) cal truth is much more complex. Hmm.. Well, from the people I have heard talk about this, they are high up, this is another debate I don't want to get into anymore.... (...) en we're in an (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) Yes, but not with the militant attitude of the modern environmentalist movement. (...) Hmmm, I just read over Genesis 1:26 - 28, "The God said, Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) It's fairly clear-cut that it *is* their reason for being. You may argue about whether they fulfill that mandate, but their reason for being and the intellectual trajectory that generated them are right in line with the idea that intellectual (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) You can get shot in any country, thank you very much, whether or not they have guns, illegal or otherwise. Did you hear of Bosnia, maybe. Chechnya (SP?) etc. Destroy what? (...) Ah, we have communities over here, Richard, whether you believe (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| | Re: Swearing?
|
| (...) To state this another way: it's extremely useful to have the word "art" have the broader definition. If Guernica is a political statement, what makes it different from: "Corrupt government is bad." That's a political statement too. But it's (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| | Re: Swearing?
|
| (...) Yup. I agree. The problem is, when does something have a victim? For adults this quite clear -- only when there is not consent. For non-adults, this gets very blurry very fast. Does a photographer have the right to publish a photograph of, (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.255)
|
|
| | Re: Swearing?
|
| (...) I actually thought it was possible that someone might claim that a sunset was God's art. (...) As Matthew or someone said, because art handles a wider scope of issues. (...) Exactly! I think that the artist's ability to explain it aims us (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: Swearing?
|
| (...) Well, it's certainly a political statement about a horrible event. On that level no, although one can marvel as to how Picasso's fracturing, cubist style creates a mood of chaos and tension. It is arguable either way. -John (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: Swearing?
|
| (...) It's useful if you are a pervert trying to pass off obscenities as art. (...) Well, one is expressed in writing and the other is expressed in a painting. (...) How about Guernica is a painting that expresses a political statement? -John (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: Swearing?
|
| (...) I am working on a definition of art that enlightens through beauty. Obscene "art" which tries to offend or elicit certain thoughts I would say is a form of political speech. I am trying to distinguish the two. (...) Exactly. When art is (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.254)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
