Results 1361 – 1380 of 1868.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
bruce
(score: 0.318)
|
|
 | | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| (...) Actually, you are trying to say everything is equally valid because everything comes down to faith. I disagree. (...) Maybe. Test it against knowns and see if consistent results are obtained. (...) No, you are assuming that I am assuming such. (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.318)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| (...) You are confusing an overwhelming body of evidence that reduces the probablity of inaccuracy to virtually nothing with "faith". You are also confusing reproducable results through a set experiment with no reproducable results that have no set (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.318)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| (...) See above: I don't always agree with a scientist's findings. So, no, I didn't take it on faith. And there were a fair number of creditable scientists that confirmed the cold fusion experiment (the problem not being the results, but the test (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.318)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| (...) Depends on how you want to phrase it: I find given the scale of the universe, it seems mathematically likely that there is extra-terrestrial life. Evidence is suggesting that planets are fairly common. The right mix of time, elements, (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.318)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| (...) If he runs on about evolution being bankrupt without addressing the other points, I think we have an answer through a non-answer. If he simply drops the subject, we probably have an answer, but can't be sure of it. Anyway, a non-answer can be (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.318)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| (...) Ummm, actually looking back on the string, Steve was making the assumption that "Darwinists" are atheists by definition. They aren't - evolution doesn't address God. Now, a Darwinist can be an atheist, but they also may not be, which is what (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.318)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| (...) No answer can be an answer when one side finds itself overmatched - slinking away quietly is an answer (I'm not saying that this is necessarily the case here). (...) It may mean he can't back up his claims. That doesn't mean others might not (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.318)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| (...) There were a fair number of responses, that may be daunting in their scope or time involved. But yes, it was more than a comment in passing and he invited debate on the subject of evolution. If he doesn't want to pursue it further, I don't (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.318)
|
|
| |
|
half
(score: 0.318)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
| (...) Simply read "Origin of Species". If Darwin had the wealth of information we have today, he'd no doubt modify his theories, but it's the best starting point. The whole point of sexual reproduction is gene mixing as an aid to rapid evolution. (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.318)
|
|
| |
|
half
(score: 0.317)
|
|
| | New annoying pop-up ad
|
| Yesterday I checked out an Osprey report on MSNBC and was pommeled by a new pop-up ad. I had already read about half the article when the screen slowly "morphed" into an ad... completely obscuring the browser so that I could not click "stop" or (...) (23 years ago, 24-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
half
(score: 0.317)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.317)
|
|
| | Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
| (...) But they are more willing to do it with a gun. And if they want to knife fight, that's okay, my knife is three feet long! Crocodile Dundee, eat your heart out. Of course, I'd reach for the 12 gauge first... Bruce well-armed liberal :-) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.317)
|
|
| |
|
half
(score: 0.317)
|
|
| | Re: "MOC" Blacksmith Shop on lego.com
|
| allow me to add some colour (oops...that's canadian...) :) commentary. <snip> (...) but it does raise a contentious issue of reality of the set (design) vs. ease of construction plus, the older sets could be made into other creations, if the the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
half
(score: 0.316)
|
|
| | Re: "MOC" Blacksmith Shop on lego.com
|
| (...) [snip] (...) I think we are/were a long way from that point. At least I hope we are/were ;-) (...) [Same here. I've left in the relevent bits I'm commenting on] (...) I'd invite you to have a look at the parts selection in Slave I. There are (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
half
(score: 0.316)
|
|
| | Re: Family values?
|
| (...) It's kind of like being convicted of manslaughter and given 18 in prison, and upon being found not guilty, still having to serve the term. The woman is not punished for fraud. The real father does not carry the burden of his actions. AND the (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.316)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.316)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
