Results 101 120 of about 1900.
|
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.569) |
|
|
| half (score: 0.568) |
|
|
| half (score: 0.567) |
|
|
| half (score: 0.566) |
|
|
| half (score: 0.566) |
|
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Because twice in the past half year isn't the same as regularly chiming in every few months. (...) So you are saying that because he has posted twice in the past half year, he is regular reader of LUGNET? Sorry; non sequitur. (18 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| half (score: 0.564) |
|
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
| (...) Some segments of society feel that, but it has nothing to do with what I just said (though I suppose if you feel that I didn't qualify "romance" as only applying to females with me, I can understand the mistake). ;-) -->Bruce<-- (19 years ago, 14-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.564) |
|
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
| (...) This is why I fear the right - they will claim anything that offends their sensiblities is the "left", and it's all usually a smokescreen for saying, "I hate anything that is different from me." Blowing up bad taste into a cultural litmus test (...) (19 years ago, 14-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.564) |
|
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
| (...) ...and speaking of fearing the left, when I visited a friend at his dorm at UC Berekeley, the bathrooms on his floor where unisex. I tell you, it ruins romance to have a girl into the stall next to you and...well, there is a point where too (...) (19 years ago, 14-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.564) |
|
| | Re: A few things...
|
| (...) Translation: "I know you are, but what am I?" -->Bruce<-- No, don't bother to respond, I'm not listening, lalalalalalalalala....... :-) (...) (19 years ago, 1-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.562) |
|
| | Re: A few things...
|
| I know you are, but what am I? I'm not listening! Lalalalala.... I'm rubber and you're glue, whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you. ...and, the ultimate retort: Nyahh, nyahh, nyahh. Sorry, I just was trying to raise the level of (...) (19 years ago, 1-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.562) |
|
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
| (...) You forget that everyone bit on the bait, including the UN. (...) Of course it is. Not exclusively. But it most certainly is a front. (...) Does it matter where the front is? The terrorists are a part of no particular nation. We must fight (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| half (score: 0.561) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.561) |
|
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
| (...) Gonzo suffers from the delusion that the Prez is his client, when in fact he should be serving the interests of the citizenry. Instead of a champion of law, the Attorney General is acting as the primary enabler of and passionate advocate for (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| half (score: 0.560) |
|
| | Re: ...just one more form of anti-Semitism
|
| (...) Posted on October 7, 2004 10:01 PM EST Email this Commentary By BRUCE S. TICKER Location: Philadelphia Those Presbyterians and Episcopalians might as well have kicked and beaten their mutual victim to a pulp while they were at it. No, not (...) (19 years ago, 1-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.559) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.553) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.552) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.552) |
|
| | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus
|
| Alright, where were we... let's see... (...) Ah, OK. It's silly how things can be taken the wrong way in a written debate that would be cleared up in an instant if we were speaking in person. But then again, I'm not much for debating in person. I (...) (18 years ago, 31-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| half (score: 0.549) |
|
| | Re: Excellent news!
|
| (...) I believe the point of three consecutive life setences is so that if someone becomes eligible for parole, they would still have to serve the next consecutive sentence (used in states that do not have "Life without any possible parole" (...) (20 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.549) | More: Next Page >>
|