Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 21 – 40 of about 12000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Plowed Ground
(URL) Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:G3s0ut.62v@lugnet.com... (...) it (...) was (...) but (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.933)

		Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
(...) If (...) in (...) resorting (...) Clever enough to balance our diets and clever enough to invent and operate a food production system that can produce all the food (and more) that we need without killing (well, I supose tractors do kill field (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.930)

		Plowed Ground
(...) Speaking of which, you've mentioned previously that "all rights are property rights" or something to that effect. I won't ask you to rehash it all for me, but do you recall approximately when or in what context that was first discussed here? (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.930)

		Re: From Harry Browne
(...) If you think they're worth doing, by all means, please go ahead. However since they involve transfers of wealth from one person to another, my position is that you ought to do them on your nickel, not mine. I am not my brother's keeper unless (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.891)

		Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion...
(...) Scott, of course, snipped the subordinate clause I put on there, the clause showing a balance of rights so that all rights are respected. As is his wont. Snip away what might disagree with your point or show that the other side is reasonable. (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.875)

		Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
Please note in the following discussion that my own feelings on when if ever abortion is appropriate are very undecided. The following is a thought exercise. Don't assume that just because I make a statement below that it equates to how I really (...) (24 years ago, 11-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.869)

		Re: LP POINT 3.2
(...) What I actually said was this: (from) (URL)Tell you what though, Scott. Pick one point, one thought, one item that (...) and again: (from) (URL)I'll repeat my offer though. If Scott picks one point or small topic and (...) Note the use (in (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.866)

		Re: Uhh, back to tax again ;-) (Was Re: Is space property?)
(...) I agree that I am sort-of legally _not_ entitled to those portions of my personal property. There are some problems in the US with whether the income tax is actually legal, but I suppose that's an issue for an other time. My claims that (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.840)

		Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
(...) I think you can start from an unfairer place and move towards a fairer place without having to start completely from scratch. I about 1% of the time think we should throw all property documentation away in NA and start over, negotiating afresh (...) (23 years ago, 11-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.787)

		Please make a donation via Paypal to the Red Cross!
I am sure that most of us received the following message from Paypal If possible, please make a donation, even the smallest amounts count. There will always be someone in need who could use everthing possible right now. I am just about to donate (...) (23 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.general)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.695)

		Infinite Justice
Infinite Justice. Has anyone noticed the peculiar nature of those words? It sounds very like what was imagined as a perpetual war in the essay within a novel, "The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism" by Emmanual Goldstein that resides (...) (23 years ago, 20-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.695)

		Re: An armed society...
(...) But according to the Constitution, it is the Court that is empowered to interpret the law. (...) I've had a small and far-too-late epiphany on this matter, or at least on how to articulate my feelings about it, so I think I might finally have (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.624)

		Re: Does it pay to be a Patriot?
(...) Well, they certainly want to be freemen, one of the 22 enumerated statuses of persons in the U.S. Constitution, and that is a worthy goal. But... Patriots, as both you and the govt. call them, are probably a very misunderstood group. Many of (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.614)

		Ture Capitalism and Property Rights (was Re: People are idiots...)
(...) Could you explain what you mean by 'all rights are property rights'? (...) Why? (Is it purely so capitalism will work?) (...) No respect for rights = socialism Respect for rights = capitalism ? No. If all rights are property rights then: (...) (21 years ago, 8-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.496)

		Re: Pure Capitalism and Property Rights (was Re: People are idiots...)
(...) Lots of interesting stuff there. Plenty of examples demonstrating that specific rights can be construed as property rights, but apparently nothing demonstrating it to be the case for all rights (but I could have missed it - there are, after (...) (21 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.465)

		Re: Ture Capitalism and Property Rights (was Re: People are idiots...)
(...) Sure... (URL) 118 (1998) is the first place I think I use that phrase in this forum. (21 years ago, 8-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.460)

		Re: People are idiots...
(...) True capitalism is more than just supply and demand, it requires recognition of property rights. Selling stuff that you stole is just thuggery or fencing, not capitalism. (...) All rights are property rights. What is right is to respect them. (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.452)

		Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
(...) Yes, it makes sense. There are certain rights that virtually everyone wants for themselves, so we make a compact with the others in a given group to acknowledge that it is best for all concerned that we grant those rights to all within the (...) (21 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.434)

		Re: Idiots, Part Deux
(...) Fundamentally, I see no problem whatsoever in animals having and being given property rights. As to what happens to the estate when Fido dies without issue? What happens when your kid who inherited your estate dies without issue? We have (...) (21 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.416)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) <snip> Far better to simply declare that all rights are property rights and assign a dollar value for all transgressions, eh Larry? Cheers Richie Dulin (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 4.411)

More: Next Page >>