Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 1461 – 1480 of about 12000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Your Rights, Your Money...
(...) Sheesh! -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.542)

		Re: Your Rights, Your Money...
(...) Well, is true that a welfare society does seem to have this very issue--simgle moms having more kids to get more money, and that should be dealt with... Here's a thought-- Better education. But I'm just throwing off the top of my head here... (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 0.542)

		Too weird for daylight...
"The Oily Americans: Why the world doesn't trust the U.S. about petroleum: A history of meddling" (URL) a little too flimsy on the Iraq issue, probably didn't want to come off as "unpatriotic" -- whatever that means nowadays.] ---...--- New Policy (...) (21 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

property
(score: 0.541)

		Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
(...) Demonstrate the need to own LEGO, then. What a silly question. No one should have to demonstrate needs here. We're talking about acquisition of property. If I have the resources, and the acquisition of property per se does not infringe the (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 0.541)

		Re: The Bill o' Rights
(...) just have to get me a set of those. :-) (21 years ago, 23-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.540)

		The Bill o' Rights
(URL) (21 years ago, 23-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.540)

		Re: Sex Scandal: U.S. President had sex with Intern!
(...) I think that I'd favor a combination of your two definitions, but I must admit that my own definition is hardly ironclad. I'd offer something like this: Tolerance is, at the very least, the acceptance of others without pre-emptively judging (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.539)

		Re: Responsible Hunting (was Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?")
(...) Handled below... (...) That's assuming deer HAVE that complex of a longterm memory (as opposed to spacial memory maps of the best places to eat, and instinct for a certain breeding grounds they've never been to before). (...) Nope - that can (...) (24 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.536)

		Re: One more reason why I'm refusing to shop in Wal*Mart
(...) A example of an intolerant generalization that is devoid of substance and meaning. (...) Prove? Cites? More BS generalizations. (...) Yes, and Christians certainly don't believe that. The Gospel revealed by Jesus is that God loves everyone (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.536)

		Re: Newsbits
(...) Not actually, the third road is to implement preventatives that do nothing touching on individual privacy or denying anyone the most fundamental of civil rights. For example, planes could and should have been made more secure years ago -- it (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.536)

		Newsbits
"Help Wanted: Jobless in America (URL) the software slump in India" (URL) India (Reuters) --The shining glass facades, swimming pools, gyms and in-house pizza joints are still there, but the mood is sombre on the campuses of India's software firms. (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.536)

		Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?"
I'm rearranging some of the points, but not the text within the points. (...) OK, I guess I can't completely. (...) Oh...I'm not trying to convince you to stop eating meat at all. And I don't think that nukes have anything to do with whether you (or (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.535)

		Re: Responsible Hunting (was Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?")
I guess this was in response to me, though I'm not exactly sure how. I hate to risk trying to connect it to the topic before which was based on rights and responsibilites since that doesn't seem to be the main point. So I'll take an approach (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.535)

		Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?"
(...) No, that's your interpretation of it, but that's not what I said. "Rights" are an artificial construct of humans so that they can better live together. Eating is a one of our most basic needs, not a right. (...) I explained why I feel they are (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.534)

		Re: Order Cancellations
(...) There are two problems here. The first problem is that the ordering system is not properly keyed into inventory, allowing people to order items which are out of stock. The system should show you if the item is out of stock, and then allow you (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, property
(score: 0.534)

		Re: Free Speech, again
(...) Na. You show ME where it's guaranteed they don't! Remember, enumeration of rights is not necessarily exhaustive. (...) How so? If they mail in their utterances and they get published, it doesn't matter where they were when they were uttered, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.534)

		Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
(...) would (...) You probably weren't really expecting an itemized response, since it was mainly a thought exercize, but here one is anyway. (...) Yes. Though I don't see the Empire as being all that different from most real empires (such as the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, property
(score: 0.534)

		Re: Welcome Worn Out
(...) My parents always had respect for my wishes & rights. Scott A (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.534)

		How Will We Ever Wash the Stink of GWB Jr. Off?!
"Children held at Guantanamo Bay" (URL) younger than 16 are being held as "enemy combatants" in the American detention camp at Guantanamo Bay, the US military admitted yesterday, a practice human rights groups condemned as repugnant and illegal. (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.534)

		Re: Tim Robbins "Countering a Wave of Hate"
(...) The difference being that he signed a contract that included (as apparently many major league contracts do) a clause about his conduct off the field as a representative of the Braves. I'd have to go digging in news archives to get the exact (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.534)

More: Next Page >>