 | | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!! —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | (...) I can't believe you think his concerns are noble. His concern is for all those big factories that are going to line his pockets (or donate to his next campaign, or whatever) when he allows them to spew carbon dioxide in copious amounts. (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Perhaps he's referring to this: (URL) wait, my mistake--that article identifies the greenhouse effect as real. And before anyone gripes about the Clinton News Network pushing a pointy-headed liberal agenda, the study appears in the scientific (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!! —James Simpson
|
| | | | | | (...) Dave!: Proportionately, developing nations do indeed put greater amounts of pollutants into the atmosphere than developed nations - chiefly because poorer countries either lack, or have chosen not to install, pollution control devices that (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) That's a very good point. "Proportionately" is a tricky word in this context because ultimately it's the net amount (and severity) of pollution, not the relative amount that's important. (...) 8^) I'm a recent import to Pittsburgh, but I've (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!! —Bill Farkas
|
| | | | (...) I think he deserves the benefit of the doubt. He hasn't demonstrated, here or in Texas, that he's one of those kinds of politicians yet. (...) That would be better than selling "nucular" technology to foreign enemies for campaign (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!! —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) He's demonstrated in two big ways so far that he's not the President he was campaigning to be. The "Uniter-not-a-divider" has rammed far-Right policy and cabinet appointments down the throat of bipartisanship, and now he's backed off a (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!! —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) He's been pretty much a straight corporate shill. Nor does he care the slightest about California voters, just corporate profit. I'm not surprised at any of this, but I am surprised at the people in denial about it both before the election and (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
