Subject:
|
Re: Is Bionicle violence?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 04:50:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
712 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
>
> > But I am disappointed that TLC seems to be "relaxing" it's long-held policy • of
> > non-violent toys. Everyone has the right to change their mind (even
> > corporations) but I dont remember seeing anything anywhere about TLC deciding
> > to do this.
>
> And I agree with *that* too. I'm conflicted. I like the Star Wars(tm) stuff,
> if only for the parts. I like the Wild West stuff, for more than just the
> parts. I even bought one of Dan's tanks. Yet I agree that I would rather TLC
> didn't have any suggestion of violence in the toys. I dunno.
Well, I participated in my first Brikwars recently, and really enjoyed it (not
least because I was on the winning side!), so I guess I'm a bit conflicted too.
> > Just my AU$0.02 (which is closer to US$0.01 these days 8?()
>
> Ya but I hear it's trending up again.
Nup. down to a 2-week low this morning. 8?(
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Is Bionicle violence?
|
| (...) And I agree with *that* too. I'm conflicted. I like the Star Wars(tm) stuff, if only for the parts. I like the Wild West stuff, for more than just the parts. I even bought one of Dan's tanks. Yet I agree that I would rather TLC didn't have any (...) (26 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
