Subject:
|
Re: Is Bionicle violence?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 04:13:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
165 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic.bionicle, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Trimmed bionicle from FUT
>
> In lugnet.technic.bionicle, Bill Farkas writes:
> > In lugnet.technic.bionicle, Michael Horvath writes:
> > > I agree with both of you. I do think it's disturbing.
> >
> > This may stir up a firestorm (not my intent), but why is violence in a
> > storyline so bad?
>
> I agree with Bill. Violence in a story isn't bad, per se. It's *celebrating
> it* as an end in and of itself that's bad.
>
> I hold with a philosophy that doesn't initiate violence but that doesn't
> mean I'm against seeing it happen when it's necessary to make a point or to
> move a story forward.
>
> ++Lar (never start a fight, but if someone starts one, and turning the other
> cheek doesn't work, fight to win)
I think I pretty much agree with your words about violence, Larry. It's summed
up pretty well in that Kenny Rogers song, which I can't remember the name of
right now, about tommy, Becky, and the Gatlan boys.
But I am disappointed that TLC seems to be "relaxing" it's long-held policy of
non-violent toys. Everyone has the right to change their mind (even
corporations) but I dont remember seeing anything anywhere about TLC deciding
to do this.
Just my AU$0.02 (which is closer to US$0.01 these days 8?()
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Is Bionicle violence?
|
| (...) And I agree with *that* too. I'm conflicted. I like the Star Wars(tm) stuff, if only for the parts. I like the Wild West stuff, for more than just the parts. I even bought one of Dan's tanks. Yet I agree that I would rather TLC didn't have any (...) (24 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
