 | | Re: Support for a 'young' earth. —Ross Crawford
|
| | | Tim Culberson <t_c_c@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3A7F69BB.27714E...hoo.com... (...) Check out (URL) these arguments and many more creationist arguments are refuted (with references). (...) Guess so 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Support for a 'young' earth. —Tim Culberson
|
| | | | (...) Thank you Ross. This citation is the most direct refutation you could have found :)...and since I don't have any counter-refutations myself, I'm not going to argue it :) Please note that this does not, however, mean that I believe it or admit (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Support for a 'young' earth. —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | Tim Culberson <t_c_c@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3A806AF4.C5570B...hoo.com... (...) (URL) > ments/ (...) Just as my quoting the above site doesn't mean I agree entirely with everything there. But there are some very good references! Regards, (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Support for a 'young' earth. —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) And here's a couple of late-breaking stories which seem to contradict the idea of a "young world": (URL) I havent investigated these at all... (23 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Support for a 'young' earth. —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) That's an excellent point-by-point clearinghouse (with some cross-links to the talk.origins site I posted, as well). Thanks for posting it, Ross. (...) article is the singularly most unflattering "official" photograph ever taken of a person? (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
