 | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question —James Brown
|
| | | (...) <snipped most of the back and forth about 'what is walking'> (...) But you are not going anywhere. Therefore you are not fulfilling the purpose of walking. (...) People throughout the ages have been. Check your ancient history. (...) "it" gets (...) (26 years ago, 17-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question —Simon Denscombe
|
| | | | (...) But you are moving - the purpose of walking. (...) Precisely - why are people dredging out ancient history. Lets go back to Roman times and get ourselves killed - back to the past! (...) The intial thought of homosexuality - if no-one knew it (...) (26 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) You brought it up! (...) Uh...then where did it come from? (...) OK, instead of cooking, how about sewing? Is it natural to wear suits? (...) Because the burden of proof is on the person with the ridiculous beliefs. (...) Exactly his point. (...) (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) OK, I thought we'd hashed this out, but apparantly I underestimated your capacity for obstinence. Walking is moving. Your statement above is the logical equivalent of saying the purpose of carrot is vegtable. (...) Actually, until it started (...) (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) Except for the slavery bit. Slavery is evil. But when we're comparing "kinds", early Roman slavery was a bit better than some. Still evil, but it did have the following positive merits: - slaves were captured as a side effect of war, not via (...) (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Not to mention that most of the masters treated their slaves well. During the Saturnalia, for 10 days each year, the roles of master and slave were reversed - quid pro quo _will_ be offered at such a time, of course. Arguably, you could say (...) (25 years ago, 27-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question —Richard Dee
|
| | | | | | | On Wed, 19 May 1999 13:17:11 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) ^^^^^^^^ (...) The context defines, but I cannot find a definition in my dictionary. If anyone could be bothered, please? (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | Need to try harder... :-) (URL) you won't find a definition for manumitted but it's a legitimate back-formation. (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question —Richard Dee
|
| | | | | | On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 13:21:03 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) Thanks for the link. I do read offline to reduce costs, so firing up the connection for a definition is prohibitive, cost-wise. It is also indicative of a (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | On Tue, 18 May 1999 22:04:34 GMT, Carbon 60 <carbon60@bigfoot.com> wrote: <Lots of stuff> Who the hell are you, and what the hell have you done with the real Carbon60? Jasper (25 years ago, 27-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
